Rigger or Riggee: Do to or done to

Rigger or Riggee: Do to or done to

I go to a Poker Parlor for the first time and sit down at the table to play a bit of poker. Two hours later I leave the game fleeced. After a couple of experiences similar to this I recognize I must better learn the rules of this game.

I diligently study the rules of the game and return to the game to find that while I am not fleeced as quickly as before, I am fleeced more slowly but continuously.

I was puzzled until I conclude that perhaps the fleecing results because of the nature of the game and of those rigging the game. I discover that I am being fleeced consistently because the people running the game also have the ability to reason; like the bull fight, if the bull does not learn to “see” the Matador he shall always end up as hamburger.

When I learned this I decide that I too shall become a rigger of games and thus fleece others who are ignorant of the facts. Later I decide that I do not wish to be either a rigger or a riggee.

The rigger of the ‘game of living’ is the predator and we are its prey. We must adapt. We must now be able to match our reasoning ability against those with reasoning ability that wish to take advantage of us. The rigger of the game understands that s/he who is more skilled at reasoning can fleece those less skilled at reasoning.

Reasoning is a human ability that can be studied and improved. One can become better at reasoning just as one can become better at dealing with quantity. When I learned arithmetic I became better at dealing with quantity. When I study critical thinking I become better at reasoning. When I study the rules of the poker game I become a better poker player. When I study the science of reasoning—CT (Critical Thinking)—I become a better thinker; I become better at understanding the complexity of the human intellect. It would also help if I become knowledgeable about how the human psyche works, i.e. if I learn a bit of psychology.
Our educational system is attempting, slowly and without much success, to teach our youngsters the science of reasoning—CT. We adults were not taught CT and thus do not recognize its importance. If we taught ourselves CT we would recognize its importance and its importance to our children. Those who rig the game of life understand the importance of learning the science of reason and use this knowledge to fleece us and will continue to do so to our children.

Learn something about critical thinking and you will better understand this message. The books are there at your local community college library or at your local bookstore. You don’t know what you don’t know. What you don’t know can hurt you.

Read a book on CT. You might open up a new worldview. The uncritical viewer cannot see beyond the surface appearance.

I think that Friedrich Nietzsche and Adam Smith did a good job of showing us that the nature of man is to “fleece” and to “be fleeced”.

Nietzsche believed that an individuals ultimate goal is to attain power over others - and an awful lot of human behavior can be explained with this logic. Everything from our political and economic systems to your poker game can be viewed as power struggles. We can also use the Will to Power to explain animal behavior all the way down to the cellular level in some instances.

Economics tell us that everything is scarce - the Will to Power makes a terrific survival mechanism, in that, the more powerful one becomes the more access to scarce resources one has. “Fleecing” is really a behavior that every living organism does on a daily basis. Sometimes there is devious, immoral, or downright illegal behavior coinciding with it, but a lot of times it’s just normal life:

If you are a database administrator, you are using the knowledge you have acquired against those who have not acquired it: you take money from others to do things that they are unaware of. If you are a sales person, your job is to persuade others to purchase a product - whether they need it or not - in order to meet quotas and get bonuses. If you are a lawyer… well, do I really have to explain that one?

The point is, survival demands that an organism takes advantage of another in some way, shape, or form. Humans are the only ones who have to justify it somehow.

Phill

It is unfortunate but most creatures consume other creatures

Fortunately, cooperating with fellow creatures can often be more productive for an individual. I guess there is a balance.

That usually involves cooperating with like organisms… it doesn’t do me much good to cooperate with a chicken - but they taste great.

Even in cooperation, the group must cooperate against another.

In that case, your beef is not with cooperation.

Let us all hold hands and sing praises to voluntary cooperative human interactions!

I don’t have a beef - I like chicken.

Cooperation assumes a group. Groups assume hierarchies. Hierarchies assume power struggles. The Will to Power exists within the group as well as outside of it.

Wow! Is that how YOU blame your losses in poker too??

Samuel…

I appreciate the attempt at dialog, but I’m sorry, your last statement makes no sense to me.

I am assuming that you are disagreeing, but could you please use more discourse to show me why you believe my statement to be incorrect?

-EDIT-

Nevermind… I see now that you were joking. lol

#-o