Rosanne

*some

Srsly‽

Yes and everything looks better turning the other cheek

Course iay mess with double vision.

Just syn 2

Hm. Sounds like you need to devote some time to that … as my therapist would say. A quick review of your posts has five instances of the word cheeks… all very odd. I hope your blushing puts the ASS in embare-ASSed right now.

You started it!

Yes, you!

Is this thread a Rosanne fan page? The proposition that Roseanne has multiple personality disorder AKA dissociative is the most psychologically interesting point on this thread IMHO. The names of her different identities: 2, Baby, Cindy, Susan, Nobody, Somebody, Joey, Heather, Roger, Kevin, Evangelina, Vangie, Martha, Mother, Piggy, Fucker, Bambi, Rosey, Roseanne, ONE. nzherald.co.nz/entertainmen … OZVCU4MME/

What is the ontological status of MPD? I mean the idea that an individual experiences multiple personalities implies a personality theory or at least a phenomenology. Contributors to the DSM V try to be about the topography of psychological behavior. On the most superficial level that would mean that a client who reports symptoms of dissociative identity disorder (criteria for diagnosis) including:

and is judged not to be malingering by a qualified psychiatrist gets the diagnosis. On cursory examination of Google I don’t see anything on Barr since 2018.

I know I said it , but really it was a misconception.meant it in the religious sense.

Well, hallelujah- you’ve converted!

Who’d be cheeky enough in today’s world to run for POTUS?

Could Megan Markle, Duchess of Sussex have a better chance than Rosanne O’Donnell. to become POTUS ?Or is Trump still hot in their tracks? Or do the lib’s have a strong platform with the current administration? What are the odds of any of this in an era of renewal in the movement toward the precipice of the Great Divide between Hollywood and DC?
Will the essence of privilege melted down into it’s basic elements? Will simulated reality brought about by the reel whirring motion of lights behind the camera be proof that the post moderns were right all along and there is place within the upper echelons of society to select a candidate based on their extremest popularity index formulated around weirdness and marked abrasiveness?

Will postmodern future exemplify the most frivolous and arbitrary emotions which can conceived to bring about the much touted New World Order?

An opinion coming down the dish water grapevine is as funny as it is hilarious. The story goes like this:
It’s about taking sides in the various back and forth arguments surrounding the multiform issues emanating out of various segments of society, where the opinion self- describes as being somewhat in the middle.

The allusion is about a very badly beaten up donkey, who is badly abused by it’s owner, after an election in an unnamed country, leading to a lot of suppressed and dissatisfied outward anger.

At any rate the marketplace is full of these hyped up people , and witnessing the sorry donkey beating, they are maniacally whipped up to a frenzy , and the owner and the man and the donkey escape in the last second .

The allusion is obvious: but instead of showing the introspective madness of the notable philosopher, the madness becomes proactively succinct and obviously evident, by threatening actions of the menacing crowd.

The opinion goes on to portray this ongoing saga as beyond the limits of anyone’s guess as to real motive and outcome.

So , no one at this point is capable to predict what the next year’s promise holds for a successive POTU$.

Anyone’s guess?

I’d vote for Blinken if he ran. Just a feeling. If Biden doesn’t survive & VP steps in, the ensuing disaster would ensure she doesn’t re-run. In my dreams.

I am not politically … whatever. Something about Blinken feels solid, though.

tiktok.com/t/ZTRc4QJQm/

I changed my mind.

Well you’re not alone in flip-flop over time, join the crowd,

tiktok.com/t/ZT81C8gmD/

tiktok.com/t/ZT81CFXgn/

I bring Roseanne into the mix with Prince Harry as well to show the complex moral insanity borne of the present societal confusion, that the dictum that beyond good and evil there could grow a normality consistent with a higher value, not out of this present social spirit, but garnered from that risen beyond the reasons out of which they formed in the first place.

Sometimes I feel like your posts are Rorschach tests.

I am glad that I wrote the reasons for observing a recurrent pattern here that exists in our society, that seems to come out of nowhere, the conflicts that occur between the left and right atr often portrayed as a singular effect that : the popularization of the notion of seeing it as treading on the very constitution, for the rights it is supposed to guarantee, and the subsequent apparent causative underpinned confusion it creates in deciding it’s utility over that of it’s morally erosive product in an open society,

None other than a comiduan( rosanne) and a faux politican couldavbeen ) demonstrates this better, although both can serve either role as well as the other.

The ramifications may serve a fatal role if not eventually relegated to dim the lights where the stage becomes a humiliating reminder of the limits of public sentiment, that can become more than just a public nuisance.

The run on the Capital is not just reminiscence of TheBastille, and the problem with all politically simulated theatrics is that they do go awry, they can add to what has not been deconstructed in popular culture, and such intensive acts can serve presidency for more scenes to undermine the constitutive construction of people like Jefferson, a true seer and early fighter for the rights of man.

Yes this is a test, a test of the evolved boundaries and how artificially unintelligible they have morphed into, with no presumption which preceded which: public short sightedness or the myopia of those who run the show.

Makes one think

tiktok.com/t/ZT814P6fN/

What if the Great, Incredible Oz was not a one-man show?

I’m with Toto.

But then not everything that makes one think meets the eye, yay, eye(I)

famous last(ing) words by menodominomingo

And then violating my own resourced conditions would think excuse your conditions , now that is an inexcusable sorry misuse of mutual agreement, so sore ry

You’re giving me a complex, Meno_.

lol jk