Sadism and masochism

Like all human traits, sadism / masochism are derivitive of some human potential. The kernel out of which the seedlings effect their often indescribable cruelty and-or pleasure, reflect on the process of inversion. It is by this time an accepted yet oft denied part of political experience. The games people play, is the exploratory rationale for what is going on when pain is inflicted. The mechanism’s structure ranges from the inadvertantslip of the tongue, all the way the barbarous mass movement of ethnic cleansing.

What is the structural brevity, the sign and signal of which attributes a cognitive simplification into the differential confusion, whereby an inversion becomes the only possible mode of adaptation to both: the internal capacity to withstand to the very limit, the feelings associated with such pain, and the external application of it, whereby to satisfy such political aims, as to create a dialectical theatre of self realization?

This type of self realization is based on the dialectic between satisfaction qua self realization, beginning in the earliest archaic process of social organization, where hierarchies of identifiable signs are established on the basis of express and impress behavior. Thereon, roles develop, in accordance to the adopted hierarchies, much of which become automatic and rote, never to be abandoned, in the deepest layers of group memory.

How do these play out in terms of feelings and thoughts about identifiers which click in to a certain resonance or dissonance, setting the stage for the religio-political shift between the internal and external motivators ? When the shift turns to exterior signals , identifiers seek to reward assimilative , concordat motives, using a reward-pleasure shift toward approved ,structurally identified programs. this process for the most part is rote, playing on the degree of sensibilities of all members of the groupings. On the other hand , when pain is exercised as a punishment for non concordence , the use of sensibilities changes assymptomatically, toward a disindentifiable process, a differentially applied reduction toward a search for a single identifiable source. This is useless, of course, because such reduction can not take into consideration the changes in type which have been omitted in the first place in the process of assimilation.

Therefore, the only way to garner any kind of reason to effect the inversion, is to bilaterally , using political expedient methods, to pretend that assimilative and dis-assimilative processes are typically and structurally the same. However, here, political expediency fails at the harmonic, level of Being, and hence the inversion is necessary to avoid a total collapse into a minimally set Nihilism, where the minimum bar is not set, and where it can only be compared with Nietzhe’s abyss. It is in an effort to avoid the totally abysmal, that inversion takes place, asymptotically, and by virtue of having to have some identifiable makers, a persona, a role is invented, so as to de-value the political pain that may cause to the expedient.

Mostly everything in this process has been built in archaic ally, and so called social change is only and can only be signified by a change in nomenclature. non of it can be changed toward a true, representatively enumerated, probability based idea, hence political inversions are necessary to make sure, the ‘system’ keeps on working. Claims of authentic experience here, are irresolute and programmed to deceive, inadvertantly of course, except for the few, who see beneath the program’s in efficacy in terms of other than the excercise of pain and pleasure. Thos who cannot stand contravert such a universally applied system, and cannot present a proper role/persona thereby, are destined to founder.

errata: political inversions should be edited to say: political inversions by revision.

One does not have to be either… is that boring? :laughing:

No, but not entirely exciting either, right now i am diffusing some excess energy relating to something quite possibly lost. But it may be lost forever, in which case who needs to worry? What is lost is lost. Don’t worry about it, someone may find it and possibly make good use of it.

Upon re-reading, Mags,it van become tedious- 'one does not have to get either…; but usually that becomes the case. Most people live in a world of mirrors, of denial or acceptance, an either or world based on wrong, or insufficient content. For this reason, the only way to communcate is the by the trial and error test of the adopting the maximum of pleasure and minimum of perceived pain in their interaction.