must there be? What’s outside? and inside? How about inside outside or outside inside? They not only ontological musings, but ontic muses making distinct pictures out of the flow of images , where eternity , cosmic consciousness can not be captured in a moment of stillness, or during a still. moment , except by the mind’s illusive shutters, the dream of the brain, trying to ‘capture’ it.
In his schema, yes. Because the distinctions make the world in his schema. So, if person A and person B have different distinctions, the world is being given two ontologies. So, there must be a struggle: what will manifest?
Unless reality is only in our heads. But then, if he is saying reality is only in our heads, his reality is only in his head, so he knows nothing about our realities.
What the IS real? What is brains all about? Is seeing part of a thought? Are we then back to square one; thinking beings? But so are animals.
Are we animals, are they so different? Do they think?
The only difference between them and us is that they have limited memories to retain bits of information and they appear different. So retention of information is the ground of Being, loose that ground, and the chasm looks back at you,with the same fear we look at than hollow.
This is why simulation is a guaranteed retention of thinking and holding unto that necessary distinction. If that were not so, then we ought not even begin to try to go there, out of the chasm and think that we ought not have even began to exist.
Yes , true, the two ontologies consist of one which is essential, reductive and anomalous, while the other is topical and specific. The Demon ironically is not a thinking being, he is naive and a trickster who doesent know himself, so he can be tricked by his lack of self knowledge. He is Dacartes’De ‘s demonic intelligence so can not recognize his identity, he is a functioning necessity, a force to reckon with as the driver who can break up the anomalie, to reach and evolve the sought after reality. The Demon functions in a way to go to a safe place, a place of objective criteria, that pushes the boundaries which schizophrenia’s push between the Id’s economy, and the Superego’s cultural bonds, appear to marginalize the limits which bound the forces that proceed from a social and personal mirroring, gene objectifying the and resisting the borderline condition’s overlap, into that objectivity, that is at once a place of clarity, and a devious splitting, which the basic fracture tries to course. The cogito becomes : I am because I intuit at this point the instinctual force of Bergson as predominating that demonic genius tries to overcome, vis. His false recognition that his thinking , his thoughts are his own. The elan vital is that , essence of a functioning and necessary trick-deception, which he himself may or may not recognize as a categorical necessity, without which all hope would , would have , been lost.
Demons.
lol.
Well then you didn’t get them, they are unwary, helpers, useful to God and trying to make sense between the scissors father and the son. They are Bergson’s soulful deception.
What if the demons are schizophrenic?
Would they be considered angels then?
The elan doesen’t discriminate between them; just as present trends prove them out, the certain limits, boundary situational borderlines , consisting an approach a a denied technically profound insane deception , which analogous state is overly denied (that it is that it is civilizations’s discontent-not a personal prideful delusive will to power- that is defaulted into the catastrophic dehumanization of Man, that is at fault NOW.
Wherein , the gnostic division upstages Alk,
But the soulful games , the joyful dances, which bear the good with the bad, the fractures with the blaming healing of the gentlest of all aenesthetics, without which life could not arise out of the darkness of despairing for it.
Yes , angels are condemned to be avenging, schizophrenic demons!
Removed for lack of meaning.
I haven’t read the thread in it’s entirety. Reached post number seven when I felt inclined to share an observation. 
It was at this point that my shadow/subconscious, schizophrenic, demonic friend - the senior partner at PCH&N, drew my attention to the statement…
“People have been taught wrong.”
It didn’t sound quite right..
I checked. Apparently it is okay, if a little blunt.
How disappointing, I thought it would be rather amusing to point out the irony. Ah well, never mind, carry on reading.
Hang on - Hallelujah! Little things, please little minds!
MoF goes on to say: “To understanding God, and Spiritual things, someone needs to understand the Prophets.”
Perhaps MoF intended saying: “To understand God…”
At which point, it occurred to me that ‘God’, or Soab, as I prefer to call ‘It’, has a good sense of humour. I suppose you would if you had the capacity to see the good in all things.
A moment or three later, I saw Meno’s peace.
It’s almost as if there are connections wherever you look - and wherever you don’t!