That works for me.
Lol. Full circle. That’s the whole point of the OP! Stop discriminating against women in science!
No. That statement is the serpent saying, “those terrible sexist men over there are abusing your poor women , you need to put your women to work in Science working for our great new world society of beautiful people and show those evil people who’s boss.”
Anti-sexism is a scam, a sexist scam aimed at gaining more remote control over more people and eventually eliminate people all together.
Note the state of the economy. Science is all about mathematics and reactions - economy. Yet somehow despite the extreme degree of Science applied to economics, the USA is striving desperately to cause itself to go bankrupt in order to establish the new global currency. It doesn’t matter how many people get wiped out, the more the better. Due to the extreme debt, the GNP must be increased at any cost, thus machines must be used in place of people, no choices, no options.
The USA simply has to get rid of people. Thanks to Science they finally can do that. And where will the women be saved? Well, in Science of course. Doing what? Pressing buttons for their foreign masters… and probably wondering where the men are.
Nine pages later and you still don’t have a clue what the study proved.
Nine pages later and you still have an incredibly low standard for “proof”.
All they did was look at identical resumes. That’s it. The evidence is as airtight as any.
A man rarely has a feminine name. A resume carries the name
It was a study. It wasn’t real. So there were men’s names and women’s names. I think the word they use for this kind of evidence is “incontrovertible”.
Yes, but names affect pre-judgment.
Incontrovertible, ,my butt.
If you provide two types of nuts to a bunch of squirrels and they show statistically that they prefer one over the other, do you conclude that they have been taught bad tastes by their wicked parents?
I am not arguing about the statistics. I am arguing that their presumptuous conclusion (so extremely common) is intentionally misleading and chosen to be so. If those same people find a study that doesn’t reflect what they want, they ignore the results and look for another excuse.
Do you hear about all of the studies done that show extreme prejudice favoring women? Of course not.
Do you hear the rationale behind why some businesses hire one gender over the other? Only when it sounds good for your cause. You, and they, presume that the squirrels have no reasoning beyond your own twisted prejudice and conclude that squirrels are “wrongfully biased”, rather than “smart enough to know what doesn’t work for them”.
What do you mean? That’s the whole point! Sexism. Exact same résumés, male names versus female names. I’m on your side here! I think???
Lol, what are you talking about? Yes, there is prejudice in favor of women in some fields. Did you think I wouldn’t know this?
You and they, not even being the slightest bit interested in what Science actually needs (not even enough to mention it), presume to tell leaders in the field of science what they need. YOU ARE THE TWISTED SEXIST.
Wow. Take it easy James.
Well, you seriously need to wake up to it.
It doesn’t fair well with your Buddhism.
What doesn’t?
Your willing prejudice with the reality of what is really going on in society.
Buddhism, presumption, and prejudice don’t really fit well together at all.
…jumping onto a bandwagon without even looking who is driving it.
What prejudice?
Dinnertime, lol. Don’t wait around for me.
See what I mean. A list of posts starting pages ago explaining how unscientific or balanced your evidence of injustice really is, and you totally ignore them in order to rage on. And then say, “Who me? What prejudice?”
You and Imbiguous are starting to look a lot alike. Yet Dasein and Buddhism are almost exact opposites.