I don’t think people consciously agree to live in societies and such. thats probably a byproduct of humans living in hunter-gathering groups where they were status striving.
I’m suire for some people its a decision and we actively decide to stay, but, we naturally have an urge to live in groups, and cities, towns, villages, tribes, are the natural extention of agriculture, which is a natural extentsion from hunter-gathering.
Do you mean, our evolved tendency to live in groups, interact andform hiearchies and detect cheators (which we have evolved adaptations to do) a ‘social contract’
Those things are largely determined by instinctual reactions to circumstancial environment input though. We don’t just ‘agree’ that money has value, most people ‘feel’ that money has value, and we feel this way because we have some inborn sense of trade.
I’m sure people do ‘agree to the social contract’ for ‘secruity’ i’m sure that most people don’t consciously agree to do these things openly, but rather do so instinctively.
In any case, on the money discussion, money used to have value because it was gold and silver and everyone loves gold and silver. Now it’s worthless pieces of paper and the sooner everyone realizes it the sooner we can get back to real sound money again.
It’s a way to trick people into thinking government is necessary. They try to say that by living in a certain geographical area you’ve consented to this ‘social contract’ bullshit. Because that makes sense.
i personally feel safe because i live in a safe place, which isn’t under attack by muslims or communists. and the whole point of the social contract is security in the broad sense of the word