self=other logistics

you must be able to split your resources evenly between all stakeholders. So if you take on two, each get half of the resources of the original. If you take on three, they each get a third.

and there’re gonna be no double standards, so if they only get a portion from you, you only get the same portion from them—even if you are their only other stakeholder (in an asymmetrical relational pattern where they have less stakeholders than you).

you can do this infinitely, but you cannot keep them (or yourself) all happy in the process. especially when you take into consideration that you do not take on new membership without unanimity of all current and potential members.

No pushback?

What do you get when you cross:

  1. Parable of the Early and Late Laborers in the Vineyard

  2. Parable of the Big Wedding Feast Guests

Linchpin: Parable of the Sower and the Soils

docs.google.com/document/d/1vt4 … UI4G0/edit

All to do with water and wine, if sowing and reaping true. Used to be a time to find some who did believe blind sided,but now come to think of it it’s way beyond that point, and only a proven imminent miracle can come close to that.

But who asks for it and for what reason, self Serbian e is axiomatically denied entry

grrrrrrrrrr

Yes but Hungarians came from Mongolia, and they had to contend with Serbians, to wit:

Why did the Mongol invasion of the 1241-1242 continue in Serbian and Bulgaria?
I’d like to point out that the route back home taken by the main Mongol forces were for other reasons than those given to mystify the history to support a wrong narrative about the Romanians of the 13th century. The map below depicts the route taken back by the surviving Mongol forces. Please note that only Batu Khan, and Kadan survived. The other participants in the Hungarian Invasion such as Böchek and the noyan Bogutai who crossed the Burzenland into Southern Transylvania, or attempted to cross the Carpathians though the Olt passage ….

Just prove a very cold fact. That is why we Mongolians have kind of slanted eyes, as do most other Asians.

Nothing is too far fetched if participants compressed to the same space, regardless how long ago, that way more can assume it to have been an act of faith.

Just saying this is silly removed

sorry not following

because you took too wide of a backward look,
but an erasure is doubly painful: for it’s like :

[quote=“Meno_”]
because you took too wide of a backward look,
but an erasure is doubly painful: for it’s like :

//https://youtu.be/4y9NtHlJvbY

youtu.be/4y9NtHlJvbY

5 seconds?

That’s your mission, maybe.

My mission disavows all knowledge of your mission.

You know 5 seconds at the ‘edge’ of time, explodes the terrain almost beyond visibility, yet, can still exclude such things as childish curiosity, that no maturing adult dismiss out of hand, sorry chalky, only the best tune-a will suffice.

Besides the unknown apprehension remains, my old gad-grand - dad developed an incurable tic on account, that I find impossible to diss miss.

where it starts

youtu.be/UGqmfzxg_zw

how it ends

youtu.be/uYPbbksJxIg

What are you talking about, what is this in reference to?

To this:

ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p … 5#p2910225

And this:

ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p … 2#p2910042

Just explain it, or copy-paste it here.

Just read John Rawls & John Nash.

No