How interesting that two Jews, and Jews in general, were a major part of the feminist movement in the “west.”
One would say that this hermaphroditic pursuit for liberation from the body, is part of Judaism itself, and Kabbalism, rooted in Gnosticism…plagiarizing a corrupted understanding of Orphism.
Why can we? I explained that exclusive homosexuality does not exist in nature. Homosexuality exists in nature. A giraffe need only be gay 95% of the time, having sex with a female once a year only, to continue the species.
Most of the gays I met IRL, were not exclusive homosexual, but were 90-95% homosexual. The exclusive homosexuality was the result of cultural conditioning, such as conditioning that “objectifying women” (codeword for LUSTing to women) is bad, while never stating that objectifying men is bad. However, homosexuals do not appear out of thin air, as solely the result of culture, they are mostly gay to begin with.
Cis heterosexuality is mock sex. Females caring about status, money and superficial masculinity displays. Then only having sex while under the influence of drugs. What a sad joke.
My quarrel with Jews is their megalomania, desire to genocide Whites, Palestinians and Iranians, their Enshitification of Silicon Valley culture, their spyware in everything, and circumcision.
My quarrel with them stops there. I do not share your hostility towards all Jewish philosophies. Leonard Nimoy had the right idea when he said that humans are broken shards of god. Its not how I would put it but I agree with the general emotion he has. I also like the idea of Jewish merchants, small businesses and Jewish millionaires. I do not like the concept of billionaires. My disagreements with Gerald Robotnik was that he thinks too small. The problem is he wanted to destroy the planet. What he should have wanted to do is destroy the whole universe. If you destroy the planet you shoot yourself in the foot and make the universe impossible to destroy.
I especially like their supposed alleged pursuit of Hermaphrodism, and escape from the body, if what you say is true.
If what you say is true (thats a big if) then it means that these Jews have evolved past animalism. You are still looking at it from an animal, slave perspective of accepting being trapped in your body. My question to you is…
If a God gave you a question, and the question was, “nonexistence forever” or “be trapped as a human for 800 billion years”
Which would you choose?
Do male giraffes have anal sex?
If they do, as with the bonobos it is mock displays of dominance or a method of relieving stress.
Spoken like a true LGBTJEW+ Woke what?
Tranny, homosexual?
What do you identify as?
Female hypergamy is part of their filtering system…..excluding males they deem inferior.
What do you identify as? Human or goat?
You’re acting like I’m saying something new. When female behavoir is obvious. Males always approach, females never approach. And females usually give passive pillow princess reluctant starfish sex to males. Its a loveless system of female prostution. Women lust for very few males only 30% of the male population at most. The entire cis-het system is a sad unfunny joke and you are in da nile about it.
That’s a good point that deserves emphasis: does one degenerate Act define the individual? Most people believe it does. So if a young degenerate does one depraved sex act, then they are defined by that act forever. Even if a Homosexual sexually reproduces, thereby being a Heterosexual by action, then some will overlook this and still pin them as Homosexuals.
So what is the definition to go by… the Act of actually reproducing, or the degenerate behaviors outside of that? @Kallikantzaros
Good point, and personal info, I’ve always been averse to Postmodern sexuality and social relationships for that specific reason – most sex acts since the 1960s and 70s are ‘mock’ sex acts. They’re not the real thing. They’re fakes. It reminds me of Stan’s @Mr_Reasonable endless bragging about his sexual “success”. I never really thought of / think of it that way…
Homosexual acts or any other perversion, is akin to Masturbation. It cannot produce Fruit. It is literally pointless.
Masturbation is not pointless, lack of masturbations leads to pent up energies, neurosis, etc. And sex with another person is not masturbation, masturbation is 2 dimensional and lacks depth.
Sex with older women cannot bear fruit either, but is superior than masturbation.
What you are trying to say is that all forms of entertainment are pointless because they have no real effects. I agree half-way, sometimes I find leveling up in videogames is pointless because I am not rewarded with sex IRL for doing so. But I believe having sex is not pointless. If you have sex with a pretty girl is that pointless? Non-reproductive sex with a pretty girl is the reward with itself. Playing quality videogames is the reward in of itself, even if you don’t get sex IRL from it. Same with watching quality movies, is the reward in of itself.
Reproduction is biological robot talk of self-replicating machines, it suggests that machines ought to self-replicate but provides no reasoning for doing so. Why should poor people that lack resources bring more people into the world just to suffer? It sounds more like a virus. Only people with quality lives should reproduce, everyone else should just have sex for fun.
Therefore entertainment is not pointless, otherwise its just loveless biological viruses self-replicating for no reason at all, just to spread more misery into the world. There has to be a reason to enjoy life, otherwise what is the point of creating more life?
Yes he speaks of all the ways he manipulates women into sex, the idea that women aren’t naturally into me and that I must only manipulate and scheme ways to get them into sex makes me hate existence and society.
“Sex with older women cannot bear fruit either”
Oh yes, it can. There was a middle-aged woman i knew back in the late 90s that was the produce manager for a Harris Teeter. She had always flirted with me but knew i didn’t like women in their late 40s. Well, i ended up offering to go by her place after she got off in exchange for a trunk full of cantaloupe and strawberries.
Not so much anymore, the current statistics is that marriage or having children within the United States is an activity in majority afforded to the wealthy only.
Fertility and reproduction rates are so bad inside the United States currently that our national fertility rate is far worse than it was ever inside the Soviet Union by historical comparison. So much for the prosperity of economic capitalism where your sexual prospects of getting laid, married, or having a family of your own is close to zero.
The only poor people in this nation that reproduce in large numbers are foreign workers, but that is a phenomena that is the same all throughout the modern west. The foreigners breed, the natives embrace sexual sterilization, abortion, or celibacy. I have my own theories as to why this occurs, but ultimately economic capitalism is the culprit of reproduction family decline.
Jewish society has always been matriarchal, not surprising at all where radical feminism derives.
IDK… a LOT of American-Mexicans reproduce in big quantities. They sustain off beans, rice, and tortillas. They live 4 to a room. So, again, my point about r-Selection comes in here. Poor people have always reproduced quickly.
Why did the African population in Africa reproduce so quickly in the late 20th Century? Because American Protestant Charity ponzi-schemes, that funneled massive quantities of money into Evangelical Mega-churches, cut like 50-50 profit and the rest into feeding the African third worlders. What did they do with the sustanence? They immediately over-reproduced. They immediately had/have children. Too many, and kept starving. Then when the charity money ceased, they mass-starved.
None of this was really reported by the West …because it was the fault of the West. Bill Gates swooped in and tested mass-vaccination on them, immediately after, from the early 2000s onward. Why was this not reported by the West? Again, because it was in the interest of the West.
I work with a lot of Mexicans, Venezuelans, Colombians, Brazilians, and Puerto Ricans almost daily. I am even on friendly terms with a lot of them.
What you will find overtime is that they have the same concerns and interests as we do.
Many of the young men I talk to at work also complain about feminism and liberal political correctness. They also find trannies repulsive, and ect.
Many of the younger men face the same problems of not being able to afford a house , getting married, or having children of their own. You will actually find a lot of commonalities if you actually take the time to talk to them.
Hate to break it to you, but even the Mexicans aren’t having large families anymore. I know a Puerto Rican man at work who complains about homosexuality every time he visits family inside Puerto Rico saying it is too prevalent there anymore.
The liberal western ideological disease of radical feminism, extreme individualism, and homosexuality has practically infected the entire world outside of the west. I have talked to Central Americans, South Americans, Indians, Chinese, Armenians, Iranians, and so on, men everywhere around the world are complaining about the same exact very things.
Sex has mutiple utilities but the primary is always reproduction.
Other utilizes, as I’ve repeatedly noted, are: anxiety relief, hierarchy affirmation, displays of dominance, expunging of accumulating libidinal energies when no available mate is present, boding……etc.
Even though there has been a rise in blacks and hispanics voting Rightwing, for Trump, etc. – it’s still 66% to 33%. 2 out of 3 are Leftists and Democrats, despite the rise. The main reason minorities are Leftists is because they take the bait from Democrats that they’ll get healthcare, welfare, social benefits, public schooling, etc.
Their votes are paid for by everybody else’s taxes. Rightwingers never had that luxury of conviction. Rightwingers don’t get to buy votes like Leftists do. That has changed slightly, in the past 15 years, because of how the Republican party is acting more like Democrats, in order to impede upon those voting blocs.
California and Texas are trying to gerrymander even more votes to try to win 2026 Congressional seats.
And this is why I suggest Segregation. Despite all your virtue-signalling and Marxist blitherings, you and your high-level chuds will never find LGBT not repulsive. As much as you talk of high and mighty utopias deep down you will never accept LGBT. In your opinion it sounds like you and the chuds almost have a genetic repulsion towards it, but I’m not sure. I think a lot of homophobes are just recovering Abrahamics, it always seems to be Abrahamics or ex-Abrahamics that have a problem with it.
Either way we can’t expect the chuds to just suddenly be reasonable. The reasonable solution is segregation, to each his own society. Those who want LGBT can go to the lgbt cities, those who want Chud can go to the chud cities, and so forth.
It seems racially harmonious. Deep down a white will never feel comfortable being the only white person in a black majority neighborhood. Every white I spoken to was like this. And they aren’t “racist” or anything. Its natural to feel uncomfortable as a minority. Just as a black person would feel uncomfortable in a white majority city. Its a disservice to force people to integrate into places where they aren’t a majority.
When I see homosexuals out in public I find many of them to be sexually arousing to me, not repulsive. Still there are some homosexuals that I find to be repulsive, but they are not the majority. Mostly its looks, if they look attractive or if they look repulsive.
Like this one time, I went to a store and there was this attractive gay homosexual there. I don’t know what “in the closet means”, does that mean they are not allowed to have a gay sounding voice? Because he never told me he was gay and didn’t wear a shirt that said “I’M GAY”. So I assumed he was gay because of his mannerisms and voice.
I almost wanted to flirt to him but I couldn’t stand the chance of being rejected. Besides I imagined we were in the bedroom together, and he pulls down his pants for me and then I can’t get it hard because I’m not gay. You see I don’t have gay genetics so there’s a very real possibility I couldn’t get hard. Although I would find the whole thing still amusing and flattering.
So I have a theory that many of these chud friends of yours actually have homosexual genetics and that is why they want them all in the closet. You see the other day, weeks ago I saw a bunch of gay porn thumbnails I found most of it I wasn’t into and yes fairly repulsive so I didn’t click it. But I wasn’t really bothered by it and if anything found it all rather humorous. Its almost as if the chud friends of yours are beta males with fragile egos, defending their fragile masculinity from gayness because just seeing 1 gay makes them feel gay all over and gay inside. But this is all just a theory, a Gay Theory… that is.
My thing is i don’t want to risk a sexual attraction to me interfering with my business with another dude. I don’t want a dude ever being affected by an attraction to me. That’s the issue with being around gay guys. Any interaction would be weird if the dude was attracted to me. Even if he wasn’t open and flaming about it. Still couldn’t risk it.
I’m what’s called a phomohobe. One that can’t risk the possibility of becoming a homophobe so they avoid being around homos.
This is part of the burden of being moderately attractive. Ugly guys don’t get bugged out by gay guys because the gay guys aren’t secretly swooning over them and making everything awkward.
I vote to send all gay males back to the island or wherever it is they came from.
I am going to present my human arguments and then I am going to present some AI arguments.
This is my human argument, which I made all by myself without AI assistance,
> You said your reasoning is that LGBT makes some incel men uncomfortable. My argument is, wouldn’t cishet make incel men even more uncomfortable than LGBT? Does not the sight of a man kissing a woman fill them with despair and envy? Does not the cisheterosexual marriage of a man and woman fill them with jealousy and angst?
> Would not the sight of a man kissing a woman, ruin their day more than the sight of a man kissing a man?
Now here are the AI arguments, the AI arguments were made with some help from humans, you could say it was an AI argument made with human assistance.
AI Argument Part 1:
It is true as an objective fact that some men feel uncomfortable with LGBT people. However, discomfort alone is not a sufficient or justifiable reason to restrict the rights or freedoms of a minority group.
Discomfort does not justify oppression
In democratic societies and human rights frameworks, the discomfort or prejudices of one group do not override the fundamental rights and dignity of another. Protecting individual freedom to live openly without fear is prioritized over catering to subjective discomfort, which can be addressed through education and social dialogue rather than coercion or legal restrictions.
Balancing rights and social harmony
Rights frameworks aim to balance competing interests, but the solution to discomfort is not forcing minority groups to hide. Instead, social progress often involves challenging and changing the sources of prejudice so that all individuals can coexist without harm or repression.
Ethical principles
Forcing LGBT people to be closeted to accommodate others’ discomfort enshrines inequality and exclusion. It signals that majority preferences, even if based on bias or fear, justify suppressing minority identities, which undermines fairness and human dignity.
Therefore, while discomfort is a fact, it does not ethically or legally justify forcing LGBT people into the closet or denying their rights.
AI Argument Part 2:
The reason democratic societies and human rights frameworks prioritize protecting individual freedoms over majority discomfort is grounded in ethical, legal, and practical considerations.
Ethical foundation: dignity and equality
Fundamentally, all people have equal moral worth and inherent dignity. Allowing the discomfort or prejudices of one group to override the rights of another devalues that group’s humanity and leads to injustice and discrimination. Protecting rights ensures that everyone can live authentically and safely, which is necessary for a just society.
Legal foundation: rule of law and protections
Rights protections and constitutions exist precisely to shield minorities from discrimination or oppression by majorities. Without these safeguards, laws would be unstable and could easily become tools for majority tyranny, undermining fairness and trust in governance.
Practical foundation: social stability and progress
When minority rights are protected, societies tend to be more stable, inclusive, and prosperous. Conversely, allowing prejudice to dictate policy creates division, suffering, and conflict. Education and dialogue help reduce discomfort by fostering understanding rather than forcing concealment.
.
As a Star Trek watcher I’m sure you can appreciate Spock’s value of logic and also the clairvoyance of various AI beings such as Data and such.