Sexocracy

[Arminius]

@equal2u

@Arminius

Your interpretation of sexuality in genaral and of sex in particular is false. It is a proton pseudos, because you use it as a premise. So your sexocracy would never work in reality.

My interpretation of sex is that it is a fundamental desire human beings have evolved to have alongside the desires for air, nutrition, excretion, hydration and sleep. We have become like this through the process of evolution. If we don’t fulfill our sexual desires we become frustrated and experience psychological disintegration. A global society that fails to fulfill its populations’ sexual desires and oppresses their sexual desires is a society that inevitably becomes riddled with crime, poverty and war and is continuously on the precipice of self destruction. The society we have today.

If you don’t realise this your interpretation of evolution, humanity, psychology, economics and pretty much everything about reality is false. So you’re the one with the proton pseudos, buddy.

No. You are the one with the proton pseudos, buddy. Your premise is false, because humans have more than one fundamental desire. Humans become even more frustrated, if they do not fulfill other fundamental deires.

So your “sexocracy” does not work. The “flower power society” of the hippies failed, and your “sexocracy” will also fail. But some of those who have other desires will welcome your “sexocracy”, because your “sexocracy” is no competitor for them. In the long run your “sexocracy” will even lead to more inequality, injustice, frustration, and so on.

I am sorry, but there is no doubt.