I dont think the OP is around, or has been for a while.
Women respond to porn standards as much as men do. Have you been to a ‘hip’ club in a big city any recent time? Also this categorical separation of porn and “real” sex suggests to me you are going through a religious phase of sorts. Of course not all sex is, thankfully, like porn, but it certainly can be, about which I have no complaints. Would you advise someone to stop reading plays because it will deform his ideas about real dialogue, real pacing? The world, especially the human psyche, does not work according to such a rigid separation of reality and projection. I recommend reading Schopenhauer and tossing that clinical ethics manual.
Ec does have a real feeling though, and this is where we all project to a degree, and that is the concept of ideal love, sounds like ‘The Sorrows of Young Werther’. There is a great trackoff a well known album, ‘Remember when You were Young’, it was a Pink Floyd song, I will try to paraphrase in a second.
Yes absolutely, Young Wether is the story of sexual frustration par excellence. It was the first literary work our German teacher had us read. Those were depressive mondays.
My courage is calling shit for what it is, regardless of the consequence to myself… more integrity, but it’s courage as well. People remark in my life that I’m a great conversationalist, and when I’m in a good mood, I make people laugh constantly… usually I modulate private jokes for their private personalities.
You didn’t watch my films I see. Women would have more security giving sex to the larger part of the population that aren’t alpha males because they and the women can always outfight them… they are much more people. If a woman screwed 20 smaller guys instead of one big guy, she is protected from the one big guy. Because she doesn’t, the smaller guys are more apathetic and less socially bonded. This is basic game theory. LOL… “pity sex” is a term only used by women. Men use it to try to sound good to women.
So you think its a good idea if a woman forfeits what she is attracted to and basically signs over her life to a mob of creatures that cant manage to get her interest… I think thats rather unrealistic. Women are, in fact, entities.
Indeed I did not watch your videos in their entirety. They are over an hour long , which is a lot even for a lecture by someone that I choose to watch of spontaneous volition. Maybe you can edit them a bit or point to time regions. Youtube has options for that.
I needed that time to explain everything, explaining world peace is not a 5 minute video. Women should be rationally sexually oriented. It doesn’t help our species to be attracted to a few alpha males… I’d call you an evolutionary religionist, you believe everything is perfect because evolution has no flaws, and get contrary when someone suggests that evolution is flawed, just like theists do when someone says God is flawed. Evolutionary theism is common.
Explaining world peace in a video 500 years would do absolutely very little. In fact, war is as necessary as peace, because let’s face it, we had our chance to be civilized but we blew it. War and peace is just another set of dichotomy, without war there would not be peace and vica versa. In fact the same goes for seexocracy, without a monopoly incentive would disappear, without the hero, nothing to speculate, to orgasm to except a shallow hull of powerlessness.
Let’s get real and get these primary pre civilized misnomers out of the way. The have been so long denied, that the have become anti rationalization so.
So come together on that one, at least.
Before the birth of modern medicine, even if a woman chose a partner based on particular traits (social rank, character, etc.), it would not guarantee that she could actually physically/biologically pass on those selected traits.
I suspect that Rh incompatibility played a hidden part in natural selection (through successful/unsuccessful pregnancies). mathildasanthropologyblog.wordp … es-evolve/
It hasn’t puzzled them because (to them) there is no puzzle. Women are simply the gatekeepers, the bosses, that choose who and when the DNA will propogate. That is why rape angers them so, it robs them of their absolute and exclusive power to decide the fate of the species on their own volition. Their volition being, fuck whoever has the biggest penis and biggest car, or is the most abusive and overbearing jocktype, rather than anything of any real merit.
There is not really a science to it, other than a women will fuck you on a random whim, and if she arbitrarily changes her mind 5 days later for no apparent reason, well you’re screwed (or not so screwed,) buddy. Women don’t follow morals and laws, they merely make the illusion that there are such morals and laws. They are simply Jews and bullies. I use the word Jew because it exemplifies an ancient morality of “do as I say, not as I do” and ancient Jews believed their race had the god given rite to conquer and slaughter whomover gentile they pleased. (Replace jew ith female, god with feminism, gentile with “male” and conquer and slaughter to instead “exclude, scrutinize and ostracize.”) For example, feminists will belittle underdogs and those with small penis size, yet cry foul when a man prefers a woman with large breasts (though men in general, could care less about such petty bodily things. It’s really propoganda and urban myth that guy’s are more shallow than women. Guys tend to want loving relationships, while women typically want a sugar daddy to manipulate and drain of their money.)
Oh this is funny… the Trixie being the Devil and God doesn’t know basic human sexuality. I never talked about this in my videos, but i will here. 64 percent of women have rape fantasies… 46 percent have aversive erotic fantasies, 45 percent of them have highly erotic fantasies and 9 percent of them have aversive fantasies. This basically means that 30% of women want to be raped. The architecture found out through multiple studies of the rape fantasy is that it wasn’t about simulating rape because it might happen and preparing ones self for the trauma, it was actually figured out through interviews, that the women derived a sense of sexual power (the men were always ugly for some odd reason) from being able to have such sexual pull that a male couldn’t resist himself, and it got them off to feel this power. Tone that psychology down just a notch and you have ALL women… they want men who cannot control themselves sexually, because it gives them a sense of sexual power. Men do not have this psychology… they don’t have rape fantasies, or if they do, they are averse.
Oh and Trixie, one more icing for the cake if you will…
More men commit suicide because women are raped than women do, because it’s AGAIN, just a bunch of assholes getting laid… which in large percentages women want, women hardly even report rapes. Women are raped at a rate of 1:4, men are raped (including homsexuality) at a rate of 1 :100, men commit suicide more for BEING raped, and for watching women GET raped… women who are raped all the time, live pretty happy lives relative to men not being raped, because they aren’t sexually stratified, and they LOVE asshole sex. Anyone who’s trying to make this species a better place as a male, get the picture and blows their brains out. And this shit is going to fall hard on EVERYONE who engages with this system. Women who forgive their rapists, just make men blow their brains out. They’ll forgive rapists (to move on spiritually LOL), but not have sex with nice guys, go figure.
I may not have articulated that well. enough Trixie, so let me try again…
More men commit suicide because women are raped than women commit suicide because women are raped, and it’s not the men raping women who are committing suicide.
What they figure out is that it’s just another asshole way that men get more sex than nice guys, and that women WANT it. Your claim was that women are so angry about rape because it removes their sexual choice… for claiming to be a woman, you certainly don’t know much about them, and for claiming to have male energy, you certainly don’t know much about what it’s like to be a man either. This is a world serious topic here, and you show complete ignorance of it. I didn’t want to share this on these boards for the thought that men might get it in their heads that it’s ok to rape women… only 30% of them want to be raped, so it’s bad odds that you’ll rape someone who wants to actually be raped (actually really good odds - 1:3) but think about those 2:3!!!) The problem is Trixie, you spout out about women as subhuman, and you don’t even know the half of it.
It’s the dirty little secret in social science that 1/3 of women want to be raped and that 1/4 women are raped (a lot of them not in that 1/3). The problem with this is that the nice guys, who are the smartest guys in the world figure out that something is seriously amiss, because women will forgive their rapists to move on spiritually, but not have sex with them (the nice guys). “You’re such a great listener” “You’re so attractive” “You’re so funny” but no sex. And then they figure it out, women only have sex with assholes and they blow their brains out.
And also Trixie, women are not “chaos” like you said, they are robotic… You use a few flairs of conspicuous consumption and they have sex with you, you talk about these problems and they won’t have sex with you. They are easy generated program algorithms of evil. No chaos there. If they are nice to you, it is because of psychopathic empathy and not genuine kindness. You listen to all the stories people tell of how they get laid, like Barry Gibb of the Bee Gees, buying a bunch of wedding rings (marriage is conspicuous consumption) and them approaching women (approaching women causes war and suicide because of approach stratification), telling them he loved them and offering one of the dozens of rings he always kept in his pocket to them to get them to have sex with him… he said it always worked, even before the Bee Gees were famous. His word for it was “rogue”, “I was a rogue” with a bit of a chuckle. Getting women into bed or getting married is an algorithmic process… you just have to know what evil is and do it.
That’s pathetic, and it costs quite a bit of money too. I’m sure the women who fall for that wouldn’t exactly be my type. He must have always gone for the dumb fuckdolls. I’ve heard that they’re the easiest, but I find them very hard because by the time they’ve uttered their first sentence I am dead of boredom.
Listen, retard, nothing I said is incompatible with your statements. When did I say women don’t enjoy rape fantasies? Of course they have rape fantasies. Of course female hypocrasy and lack of empathy drives men to suicide. Women have little no consistency between spoken morals, and actual behavoirs, that is, their actual behavoirs do not coincide with their spoken moral views. So keep on slandering me when nothing I said actually contradicts most of what you said, retard.
Women are chaos though, though many have rape fantasies, many will complain about being raped if the rape scenario doesn’t fit the particular (random) set of aesthetics they had in mind at the time.
This is true. However, none of this makes me a retard. In fact, Trixie, I solved ethics… which makes me the least retarded person who’s ever been born. To prove I’m a retard, you have to divulge your secret… which transcends my told solution:
Suicide rate in utopian society is not a reliable test of morality. For example, saying people will go to a bad place if they kill themselves will force people to stay alive even if they don’t want to.
Now you might say that this counts toward making suicide “not easy.”
But take away the religious teachings, and give them lives of natural comforts. They might be unhappy but develop a natural aversion and fear of death and the unknown. So they might be miserable and complacent, but develop a mentality that dying might be a worse alternative, no matter how easy and painless suicide is, death is an unknown and they don’t take it as an option.
Therefore, you haven’t solved anything or made morality or happiness testable with such a method.