Luv it when these postmodern convectional minds regurgitate the “phobe” part…homophobia.
Ha!!
Not disgust…fear.
The brave ones, like them…are fearless homophiles.
Yet…ephivophobes…necrophobes…zoophobes…
1 Like
2039
2 times 3 = 6
9 divided by 3 = 3
3 sixes
666
Ok, I’m sold! I’m sold!
Let me go now and prepare for these last 14 years!!
Thanks for the heads up… I guess.
Only Americanism normalize homosexuality and made it into a lifestyle option…
It’s ideological foundations, in Abrahamic dogma, leads here.
Once you’ve accepted this absurdity that mind and body are separate and contrary - dissonance - or that there’s some abstraction, ideal, named spirit or soul, which is the opposite of what the body is, then it follows, from this, that a man can be born in the “wrong body,” and that sex evolved for pleasure, rather than reproducing genes.
The means is mistaken as the motive…or the objective.
The lies concerning ancient-Greek and Roman homosexuality have been propagated by modern/postmodern academics…because ti fits into the American paradigm.
The self-made, liberated man, who can CHOOSE to live as anything he desires, unhindered by anything.
Normalizing these unfit sexual inclinations is part of the end-phase of civilizations…and those that promote them are accelerating the process.
LGBTJEWQRMNOP+ percentages are rising in the American dominion… and that’s a sure sign of what is coming.
A diseased empire, gradually losing its ability to repelnish its human resources.
Islam and Christianity did not invent shame and guilt, nor were they the first to reject homosexuality or any form of perversion…
The slandering of paganism, ancient-Greece and Rome is part of how they spin history to subvert European paternalism.
We see it in real time and how they are gradually race and gender swapping every European historical figure.
It’s part of an insidious ehtnic cleansing…including open borders and insisting that Europe accept hoards of Asian and African migrants, gradually destroying the original culture and diluting its native population.
A War Like no Other
A feminine method using proxies…parasitical.
1 Like
That’s how it is today already in much of the world.
No way. In today’s world when a child is sexually abused the chances the abuser will be brought to justice are very small. No country enforces surgical castration of rapists.
Hey Silenus, it doesn’t fucking matter what the fuck happened with homosexuality in ancient Greece or Rome or anywhere else at any time in history. Some men are sexually attracted to other men, some women are sexually attracted to other women, that’s the way things are, always have been and always will be. And there’s nothing wrong with it whatsoever. Stop being homophobic.
1 Like
Yes, I agree 
You could also sum it up thus: let each one take care of their genitals.
If everyone should ‘take care of their genitals’ then what if a parent learns that his daughter was seduced or raped by a degenerate…what are his or her options?
If this is the case, then pedophilia, bestiality, zoophilia, rape…are all okay…according to these fuckturds.
If homosexuality is okay, then why is not pedophilia, or necrophilia, or rape?
If consent is the issue then why is seduction of weakness prohibited?
Why does a child not have the ability to offer consent…based on what?
His appearance…his biological age…
Ageism based on appearances and biology?
You can’t have it both ways, fucktards.
If biology matters with age then it matters always.
You can’t pick and choose when it matters…another example of free-will exploited by nihilists.
If a man can be a woman, then a child can be an adult, and a cow can be human…and a dead man can be alive.
1 Like
I agree with you more than Max and Tim - I don’t think it can be as simplified as everyone just take care of their genitals. 
Human sexuality and living in a community successfully is not that simple (unlike what Max and Tim is suggesting).
The fact that sex is so important and the center of our discussions is part of the Feminization of Man
That we are focused on gender and sex…is part of it.
That philosophy is now dominated by words, with no references to anything independently experiences…IS part of femininity.
That we deny morality and free-will, and identity, and race, and gender…IS part of feminization.
It explains everything about Americanism and its modern/postmodern techno-utopianism and…I dare say, it explains Abrahamism’s popularity..
What? I am not denying ethnicity exists and sex.
But those are different discussions - I’m not sure what you are trying to stereotype on me.
I voted for Donald Trump. and I love what he’s doing bring the military in violent cities and getting illegal immigrants out.
I do not think you know my positions.
We already talked about the ills of Abrahamism, and how I think you are a Christian but you say you’re atheist - like many Americans say they’re atheist, but when confronted with sensitive issues then they latch on to Christian dogma and explanation of the world. And you like to mock heathen and pagan explanations of things like astrology. You praise the Romans and the Greeks for their heathenism until the issue becomes sensitive, then latch on to Christian ideals.
Nobody is constantly talking about YOU!!!
1 Like
Okay.
But when you continue saying ‘We, we that, we this’ and you do not direct who you are talking about then it sounds like you are talking about ALL of us.
Silenus, not everything that men talk about that does not follow Christian ideals is feminisation. You go too far with that.
All of us know sex is very important to us. Our identity is shaped by it too. The fact men think of sex 3x more than women, testosterone is actually MASCULINE and inducing men to be more interested in sex than women. WHAT we are doing is actually FAIRLY MASCULINE TO TALK ABOUT SEX.
Women don’t talk about sex too much. They care more about talking about other things. I’ve been around many women my whole life, I know this from first hand experience. They are not interested in sex much.
In fact women who talk about sex TOO MUCH IS CONSIDERED TOO MASCULINE AND A TURN OFF FOR MANY STRAIGHT MEN. That is why they do not want to have a prostitute as a lover, most straight men do not like women to wear slutty clothes, and so on.
The type of Bisexuals you complain about, the ones that are unable to form real relationships. Its from a lack of lust. Lack of lust causes all the problems you describe. The Bisexuals were probably hurt by women, so they start to love men, but are unable to lust for men deeply. And the women who hurt the Bisexuals in the first place, the women hurt them because they didn’t lust for them in the first place, causing the chain-reaction in the first place.
Have you heard of a thing called post-nut clarity? Its when someone nuts and then loses attraction after they nut. Post-nut clarity destroys relationships. Its lack of lust that destroys relationships
Lack of lust is why there is Hypergamy and why men are betas. Its why women pull around their husbands on a leash and why men have no say or freedom. They know their wife or girlfriend has all the power and can choose to leave ‘em at any time, because she has hardly any lust.
It’s like this. Which is a real relationship, a kiss on a cheek or a kiss on the lip? Kiss on a cheek means a lack of lust. You can only kiss someone on the lips you are sexually attracted to. Kiss on a cheek means its not a real relationship, its a beta male that’s going to be treated badly by the female.
And your family being volcels that haven’t had sex in 30 years is deeply unhealthy. Lack of sex is deeply unhealthy. Suggesting that men should wait until their 40s or 50s is deeply unhealthy. Suggesting that women ought to be hypergamous and are entitled to only high income males is deeply unhealthy. And suggesting that males need to be high income in order to properly form a loving relationship is unhealthy. A relationship isn’t about having endless freetime to dote on someone, it sounds suffocating. Men are supposed to be on hunting expeditions in the woods. Only after invention of Agriculture (decline of hunter-gatherer culture) did 94% males become sexless virgins. Then society also became Hierarchal with workers at the bottom and slaves at the bottom, and politicians and priests at the top. And the majority of people were at the bottom
About consent. Sex should only ever occur when it is fully consensual.
So Silenus, sex with dead bodies is definitely not allowed because the dead cannot consent.
Adults should not be allowed to have sex with children, even if there is consent. Consensual sex between, for example, a 14 year old and 35 year old should be a crime for the adult, but less serious than rape.
Youngsters should be able to have sex with each other without being criminalised. So 12-15 year olds should be able to legally have sex with other adolescents provided the age difference isn’t greater than 1 year.
A dying man can give consent to his lover for the sexual use of his cadaver.
Children and animals can give consent.
You are an ageist….an ephybophobe.
You judge people, and all living beings, according to their biological age….and how they appear.
For shame….how dare you?!!!
Age is a social construct….like race and gender.
A 50 year-old can be less mature than a 15 year-old.
This is according to your modern, postmodern, ‘logic.’
Biology based identifiers are forbidden….one must judge everyone as an individual.
Appearances are illusory - superficial. Stop contradicting your own ideals by judging people based on how they look.
If they bleed they need. If a woman has a period then she is fertile. AOC should be soley based on science.
If a woman doesn’t have a period until 16, then she’s off limits until that age, period.
Static, concrete laws are a stone age way of looking at things. Everyone is biologically different.
Some girls have first period at less than 10.
Age isn’t a social construct. It’s a biological process. Gender is biological. Race is usually biological.
I am not an ageist. I don’t think a 70 year old should legally be able to have sex with a 16 year old, even if it is consensual.
My core principle is that each and every human being is fundamentally equal in value. Young and old, rich and poor, black and white, murderer and innocent.