Hello, I have posted here over 2800 times so maybe I am credible, also crazy,

So maybe gravity is caused by some force outside of our solar system, and separately caused by some force outside our galaxy, and separately caused by some force outside our galaxy cluster

BY A FORCE PUSHING INWARD FROM OUTSIDE

Why do i think this? 10th grade geometry.

Yes that is exactly what I wrote and it is what you will find fascinating very soon.

So as we all should know, the force of gravity operates by the following equation (if we ignore Einstein’s Special R, which I think we can, in this case):

Force =

mass of object one TIMES mass of object two

DIVIDED BY

DISTANCE SQUARED

(after you get that number) TIMES

arbitrary constant from nowhere that i don’t know why = 6.67384

Calculate that, it is really simple. You can find the attraction between two objects.

If you decrease the distance between two objects by a factor of two, then you will increase this magical force by a factor of (two squared=four). If you have two objects separated by 100 light years, and you measure their gravitational attraction at that time, and then you decrease their distance down to 25 light years, the force will increase to be sixteen times more powerful. [(100/25 = 4; 4^2=16)…twenty five is in the denominator and it is the one that gets squared… so it is “inverse squared” because it’s in the denominator]

I have found it fascinating, in a heartwarmingly amateurish way, that putting the “radius squared” in the denominator of your equation, causes this gravity equation to be shockingly similar to a seemingly useless equation that calculates the area of a shadow cast on a distant object.

Yes that is what it sounds like.

When a sphere goes near another sphere, and we assume that some light source is casting on these two objects from the outside of both of them:

The shadow cast on one object from another increases at the exact same rate as the force of gravity. I mean the area of the base of a CONE increases with an inverse squared relationship to the HEIGHT OF THE CONE. TENTH GRADE GEOMETRY. (edit- I am taking for granted, at this point, that it is clear that the tenth geometry of calculating the base area of a cone corresponds to a really new science of shadow gravity. I am taking for granted, at this point, the idea that everyone will accept the possibility that it really is so easy to overthrow newton and tell newton to his face “dude it is the base area of cones with an arbitrary constant, where did you get that constant??” that is what i am taking for granted. I dont want to be proven correct here. That would be nice, but I am asking questions more than I am demanding Nobels)

(then multiply it by the newtonianly assumed gravitational constant and newton could have easily shown that shadows cause gravity, easily. right?)

So then einstein said some stuff apparently and now all interpretations of gravity are much more complicated. Good fine. Except special relativity as it applies to the orbit of mercury only applies in unusual circumstances and, I believe, can be ignored on large projects, such as Newton’s project, to calculate the behavior of all planets besides Mercury. I mean Einstein solved an unrelated problem with special relativity and Mercury. He went on to solve a very unrelated problem when he made General Relativity. I welcome all criticisms of my extremely intellectual and well informed craziness as it pertains to my narrow selection of data. I do not believe that Einstein’s theories apply to my theory here at all.

I have a thread dedicated to this idea on this very forum, from many thousands of years ago, and i was not satisfied with the response. The response did not prove to me that the idea of shadow gravity is wrong. You can search for that thread, the title contains “Shadow Gravity” and I admit it was created at a time long before the internet existed, like 2002 or something I don’t know.

The response most certainly did perform the typical task of an internet intellectual forum, where people provide hyperlinks to other works that disagree. I don’t know, I wasn’t satisfied. This happened at least five years ago. Let’s start fresh. Why not shadow gravity? Let’s flex our brain muscles and explain to me why not?

Conflicting evidence? The properties of photons? Existence of “dark matter” and therefore “dark humans”?

What about the sudden decrease in velocity of our first space probe? I think it was Voyager One. It reached past the Pluto orbit (obviously NOT a planet) and into the Kuiper Belt and it SUDDENLY DECREASED IN VELOCITY!!?!>!>!

I know how to explain that decrease in velocity based on my simple and earth shattering theory described here.

Can anyone else?

Can anyone please explain to me where to find such an explanation? Why decrease velocity, Voyager one? Anyone know?!?!?!?!

Because this was like fing four years ago that some force (and nobody suggested friction with the Kuiper Belt, nobody had a damn clue), FOUR YEARS AGO>!!>? WHY SLOW DOWN VOYAGER?!?!!?

Fail to understand extra-solar gravity?

“The Forces of gravity everywhere in the universe are exactly always equal to the forces of gravity that we observe on Earth?”

=

“The Earth is the center”

=

“ADurp derp lets just ask the Pope of science derp and not think for ourselves.”