Is 15 or 16 yr olds having sexual intercourse too young?
No. Perfectly natural.
Yes. It is offensive to society.
Yes. It is against the moral feature of god and religion. ( Teasing.)
Yes. Young people should be chaste. It is the moral and human thing to do. ( Teasing.)
No. We should have more of it.
0voters
I am sick and tired of the media or most civil servants complaining about people being too young to have sex.
Most recent example: Jamie Lynn Spears.
All throughout history in the past women were married off at 15 or 16 for thousands of years so having sex at that age is not so unusual infact I would call it perfectly natural.
We live in a world where we defame the young who have sex at a early age for the only reason being that they have sacrificed their future marketing potential or investments for their primitive natural instinctual urges.
( The highest sin of a market society.)
( Because the market is the new religion.)
( 15 or 16 is the age of sexual maturity biologically for people.)
For the record if I was to meet Jamie Lynn Spears I would probally hit that. ( I’m 21 bite me.)
Opinions? ( The feminists or puritan police should have fun with this thread.)
It is completely natural for that age. However, I really do not find Jamie Spears to be very attractive. If you were to spend the afternoon scraping the play-doh off her face, you would see.
I do agree with your views on humanity for the most part, especially on this subject.
chaste was the nearest choice for me, but yeah, it’s normal for teenagers to start displaying their affections in a more ‘mature’ manner: when them urges start getting the better of them.
I do find it funny that she announced her being knocked up just before her mum was due to publish a book on Christian Parenting.
Plenty of countries have a legal standard of 15 for the age of consent. I don’t think the number itself makes a massive amount of difference. I think sexualising our children and filling the food chain with steroids and hormones is more significant…