Every single murderous/manipulating intent filled man or woman has an unusual level of intelligence based entirely on their ability to read people like books. [size=200]Politicians are a great example of psychopathy or if you want to use the euphemism, then let’s call it passive-aggressiveness.[/size]
So, I don’t care if you ignore my intelligence for your ignorance. But, [size=200]when you ignore the psychopath’s intelligence for your ignorance, that’s when you make two enemies, instead of one.[/size] People are so contradicting, that they can make good intelligence and bad intelligence despise you.
When you have two faces of intelligence working against ignorance, for different reasons, it’s time for you to cut ties with ignorance ASAP. [size=150]For good reason, people ignore the intelligence for their ignorance; [/size] [size=200]for bad reason, people never ever suspect that there are intelligent people out there that are using it to control you and get what they want.[/size] Good intelligence will always beat bad intelligence, but intelligence of any kind will always beat ignorance.
And you guys think my intelligence is a problem. You don’t even know the beginning of what tyrants and serpents lie beneath the surface. I do, too bad for you. Even if you somehow manage to figure out there’s a psychopath in your life, you won’t have the capacity to handle them. Just remember, that the reason why this society is filled with psychopaths, is because you guys killed personalities. [size=200] Hence why every class room has that stereotype where teachers envy a student’s artistic ability, trashing their work, while the kids around the artist laugh, when they are going to grow up as failures and fools.[/size]
Indeed I am - although the psychical flexibility of the brain makes it seem involuntary because indeed the brain does all the work - we being human is all about controlling our brain’s psychical mechanisms, this includes psychopathy and other mental abnormalities. The brain takes away our ability to feel and appreciate life the same way our brain takes away our memories when they are too painful - those memories are not “gone”, even though the “pain is gone” - the same illusion applies to psychopathy. The fact that the “pain is gone”, is evidence that your human properties are also gone. The brain may not be active in a way a normal brain is, but when the brain does not light up, it does not mean that they “don’t have those properties”; what it means is that they are not “using those properties”. Anyone can go back and gain back their brain’s old properties at any point in time the moment they psychically push themselves into gear towards that psychical application. Psychopathy is the result of one’s brain hiding the properties which make us human - a psychopath generally feels they cannot go back because their psychopathy lead to “controversial” decisions and “mistakes that cannot be reversed”. However, as someone who showed signs of psychopathy and done things as such, I can reasonably demonstrate in person that the brain is fully accessible - however we as people are not fully applicable at those young times in our lives when we make the most mistakes, so because we lack wisdom, control and guidelines, we live the rest of our life punishing ourselves on a subconscious level for the scars we’ve created in our more vulnerable stages in life. Therefore, what I did was own up and understand how to evolve from my previous stage in life to show everyone that everyone can change - all you have to do is turn the page and always - always - see the world as differently every day as you can as well as living greater than the person you were yesterday.
The better question would be - can a missing brain cause psychopathy? The answer is no. Yes, the brain covers psychical systems to how our body interacts with everything, however what makes us “human” is based on “chemicals” - our brain is NOT “limited to those chemicals”. In fact, those chemicals run through our body and are running through the body of a psychopath despite them not “reacting to those specific psychical properties”.
I am saying that the brain is like a car with a manual and auto-pilot mechanism implemented into it.
When YOU don’t take control - the brain takes control based on biological and universal reactions that occur on a chemical and micro level.
When YOU take control - the brain does not take control and will not take control until you give it control.
In other words, when people get addicted - they are not using drugs - drugs are using them.
Chemicals and reactions have a self-valuing principle ingrained into the subatomic faculties which act as a process to animate our everyday interactions.
Let me tell you this - you can tell the difference between someone who took control over their brain and someone who let’s the brain do the work for them.
This, alone, is evidence that there is a time when we’re ignorant, young and naive when the brain “parents us”, but when we grow out of that the brain gives us freedom and control. However, do not mistake people’s ability to act independently and unpredictably as “growing out of the brain’s control” - it’s not necessarily true. A wise man truly shows full control over their thoughts, emotions and experience. A drug user that does whatever they want, or a prideful parent that says their word goes, is not the “control” I am talking about. The control I speak of is “self-humility”, “passion” and omni-reverence. The three fundamental principles of genius. When you see someone in full control over their brain’s activity - you will know it right then and there. People are scared of people who have broken out of the “boundaries of senses”. When someone is able to act entirely on their own will, their own passion and directional influence - that’s how geniuses are born. That’s how geniuses are known. That’s how geniuses are recognized.
Many people are on auto-pilot. They don’t “think for themselves”. They don’t “apply themselves”. Their self-esteem, confidence, self-acknowledgement and self-reflection capabilities are lower than any object on a planet with a gravity force that pushes all objects to ground level.
It’s very important to recognize the different between a man who is manually experiencing life and a man who is doing it based on second nature, biology and advanced mechanics of stimuli.
Well now I’m confused. It seems like you’re saying that brain states and psychological states have some causal link between them. And that it’s all just chemicals, but then it seems like you’re postulating some kind of self which can take control of the brain thus creating some kind of mind/body dualism that at first glance seems to go against the notion that chemical states determine behavioral ones.
Auto-pilot is a pre-evolutionary trait that existed before intelligence did - animals are on auto-pilot like humans. Some animals are not on auto-pilot, therefore the behavioral differences are demonstrable if you observe them.
Taking control is a part of “evolution” - it’s always been one of the Universe’s principles since the beginning of time. Our photo receptors emerged billions of years before stars were born to capture our experiences today visually. I think it’s safe to say that this Universe took this time to evolve as it did to create the human experience.
If so, you’re not fit for an intellectual conversation that does not care about what you “feel” - it’s all about the facts; facts based on humanity and accuracy.
If you have something against manual riders being a higher evolutionary form compared to auto riders, you would be arguing with science. I suggest you to make your rounds now and decide whether or not you truly want to embarrass yourself for your feelings by ignoring the facts for them. Otherwise, we can discuss this, but I will not have any denial or encouraging of abnormal properties of the brain. This is a serious situation - I cannot let your feelings destroy the clarity of this reforming of human evolution. This world is creating more psychopaths than personalities because psychopathy is a fundamental issue which can be fundamentally explained - I will not be tolerating emotional naivety. Accusing someone of being mad at something is not an argument nor will it benefit this discussion. You are taking this personal and everyone knows emotional people ruin practical situations.
I’m just asking questions so that I can understand your position in its entirety. What makes you think that I could be taking anything personal here? You lost me with that comment.
I explained to you in a meticulous manner how the human brain is designed with a manual/auto system which takes control depending on your “will”. Nothing I said could have driven the greatest psycho-analysts in the world to fall under the impression of anger coming from me.
Nothing at all. Therefore there’s only one way for you to assume so. You are taking this personally. What does anger have to do with my position? What does what you wrote have anything to do with what I said at face value? There’s no context twisting games here. I said something blatant and clear - great people break out of the auto-pilot - not so great people continue to live their lives on auto-pilot. This can be scientifically proven. It can be observed in animals. It can be observed in the difference between the personalities of great leaders, great thinkers and great comedians from ungrateful fools, ungrateful sheeple and ungrateful politicians. There is a distinctive value that can be understood when you compare a wise man to an unwise man - the difference between them is simple - the wise man is manually controlling themselves while the unwise man let’s others teach them, let’s others guide them and let’s their chemicals/stimuli do all the work. This is just irrefutable.
Yet after writing that, your response was irrelevant and personal. If it wasn’t personal, then it was naive, ignorant while demonstrating supreme failure in understanding the analytic strength of my posts. If you don’t understand it, it’s okay. I will help you understand it. What ever you do, don’t ask silly questions. Look at what I said at face value and ask me questions regarding what you do not understand. You have absolutely no incentive to ask me if I am angry at X - my post has zero correlation to your questions, therefore those questions are as cold and ephemeral as particles of snow falling in melt-prone atmospheres.