I’m willing to bet anybody here, 10 to 1, that size does matter.
Here is the test:
Take a sample of 1,000 men from all nationalities, backgrounds, cultures, classes, and so forth. Ask them to rate their general level of self-confidence or self-image on a scale between zero and ten, with zero being not confident at all, and ten being as confident as possible. They must take this test first without being aware of the second part of the test. After they give there answers, then these participants must allow for scientists to measure their penis dimensions and overall body weight. Once their weights are known, then their penis and scrotum should be measured by their erect and non-erect surface areas. Each of these surface areas should be given a ratio to the man’s mass body weight.
I predict that the results will end up like this:
Men who mark themselves as very high in confidence will have large penises according to their body mass ratio.
Men who mark themselves as very low in confidence will have small penises according to their body mass ratio.
I guarantee you that the age-old question will finally be known: size does matter. Furthermore, this affects the physiology and psychology of the whole male animal. Men who are authority figures almost always have large dicks. Truth hurts.
Y’know what, i’m sure this is bullshit. No one is saying that size doesn’t effect confidence, but things like social status, how many women you sleep with a week, how many houses you own, that type of thing, is more correlated with confidence.
The best predictor of how attractive someone’s wife is: their paycheck.
the best predictor of someone’s status: either riches or social standing
social status, confidence, contentment are all statistically linked/correlated to a very very high degree. With low status people taking more heart-attacks and having more stress in general.
you could have a 3inch ‘weapon’ and be one of the most confident people in the world, it depends on social status, which largely depends on factors independent of what you’re talking about.
Theres nothing for them to be un-confident about. Beautiful women statistically seek high status men, lots and lots and lots of high status men, are only high status because of other things; riches, intelligence, whatever.
maybe a porn star has status because of wealth + THAT.
but most people aren’t porn-stars, and the main thing which determines confidence rate is social status, independent of all other factors.
Hmmm I read a little while ago about a number of studies during which people of both sexes were asked to view assorted photographic portraits in order pick people they would ‘date’. Most chose someone they regarded as equally attractive in comparison to themselves. In other words average Joe and Joette would not choose a Brad or Angelina (or a Halle Berry or a Will Smith) as their preferred date. When asked to pair up random people into couples; once again like was paired with like.
But money really does seem to make men appear more attractive in the eyes of beautiful but not necessarily high status women. ‘Strangely’ beautiful, high status women seem more than willing to date lower status (both financially and in terms of attractiveness) men. Apart from Brad and Angelina, that is, who appear to be a law unto themselves.
This test can be proven. You know this right? So you can put your money where your mouth is if you’d like. Maybe the guy with a 3-inch penis, who has a billion dollars in his bank account is, “compensating?” Perhaps we should phone some scientists and get things started?
Does it matter if their compensating? I said that social status has a correlation with confidence thats a lot stronger than someone’s penis size. Whether or not they tried harder to gain social status to appeal to other people, because of misgivings about personal qualities is irrelevant once they *gain the confidence.
if theres scientific evidence or peer reviewed articles showing a stronger link between penis size and confidence (than social status) point me towards it. If not, then maybe you should start calling scientists looking for support for your claims*
theres already a large body of psychological literature on social status/health social status/contentment social status/confidence.
No. 1 male prerogative: to get the best piece of skirt a male can get within his lifetime, by utilising all the tools he has at hand (be they conceptual or physical, hehehe)
Size does matter, but I have a small penis; a small flaccid one.
I had to impregnate my ex-wife with a turkey baster and a pair of socks…don’t ask.
Anywho, my flaccid cock has been a constant source of stress for me.
I’ve become bitter and angry towards females that remind me of my softness and so I overcompensate with ideas, that are obviously all about me, that exaggerate my manliness.
I’ve used this forum to comfort myself and to overcompensate for my unusable tiny member.
It was small to begin with, now it doesn’t even work.
Can’t you see how bitter and angry towards women I am?
How do you explain it?
Women are smart, wonderful and as smart as men…and when they fart it smells like daisies.
Why would anyone put down just delicate, pretty, creatures and say nasty things, even if they might be true?
We must make ourselves feel better. We must support one another.
We only have us and 6 billion other people to help us out.
You can’t resuscitate the dead…unless you are Jesus.
I don’t even want to. Such a small penis can only make little girls laugh…I hate littler girls!
Oh, how they laughed when I was pushed naked into the girls locker room, way back when I was still pure and innocent.
they laughed and laughed. Then the boys came in and gang-raped me.
I felt so cheap and so emascualted.
It hasn’t worked since.
