I’ve been mostly in Rant House so I don’t know if anyone else has already asked the question, but who is PG? Some of you apparently have PMed him/her and have seen him/her in a different context. S/he’s too much of a “character” to be real, so the only question remains: who is s/he really? Then again, I’ve been called a caricature myself, so what do I know??? 
I’ll probably forget about this thread in a few hours, so feel free to PM me with your answers…
PG is PhilosophyGirl, and her sour attitude towards some ILP members (namely James) is due to ummm “confrontational problems” and i think there is a bit of romance in there too so it get’s heated 
if you really want to know who she is, just stick around 
PhilosophyGirl
i dont blame you, after all, you were banned for a while… 
unless it really IS someone else?
Oops. Sorry, Blindseer and Drift. I should have been clearer. I know that PG = Philosophy Girl, but I’m wondering who this person really is and what his/her game is.
For instance, I did read the thread where PG supposedly met up with J2–for which I felt so dirty for days afterwards…hell, I also feel dirty for having this sick interest in the mystery of PG 
--but it seemed so silly and contrived that I suspected it was all part of a “game” that J2 is playing with whomever PG really is, if not J2 himself (not likely). Now, if PG is “real” and really met with J2, then it’s equally plausible that the two of them made up the silly “fight” between them.
The only question is whether siatd is in on the act as well. I thought he would be too sharp to be taken in by a phony poster like PG, so either he is part of the game or he is just humouring PG and/or J2.
These are the kinds of things I was getting at with my original inquiry into PG. If I followed their interplay more carefully/thoroughly, I might have a better handle on things, but from just the two threads I’ve seen in which PG, J2, and siatd all interact, it’s too difficult to tell. All I can see is that their dynamics are either phoney and/or really immature… 
Not that there’s anything wrong with that…and what does it say about me, that I’m actually curious as to the motivation/facts behind their likely charade? 
Okay, my only saving grace is that I am not so pathetic that I would be curious enough to try to discover siatd’s and J2’s history, which would enable me to guage their interactions whenever PG is involved…But being that I always check my Ps and Qs, I’m pretty sure I’ll have all of my answers soon enough… 
If I had to take a guess…
Siatd messaged PG, or PG Siatd and they designed this ‘joke’ to play on James and everyone else.
That… pretty much it.
Or perhaps Embrace Trees was the true target? But siatd does have very obvious feelings for ET, so that couldn’t be it, could it? On the other hand, perhaps ET spurned the poor boy once too often and this is his horrible revenge? Or, since ET has the hots for J2 (no accounting for taste, or lack thereof… 
), this is siatd’s way of getting back at both ET and J2???
Okay, O_G, I’m presuming you’re fucked up on some nice bud, so what’s my excuse for this sick interest in this soap opera, “The Young and the Clueless”? 
Aside from the fact that I’m stuck on the last few paragraphs of this report, that is… 
lol… I couldn’t begin to tell you why you, or I am here right now.
Now that I think about it my last post doesn’t make sense. And yes… I am fucked.
Where has ET been lately?
P&Q
You know it’s actually kinda fascinating to see you perform your ‘analysis’ on this situation. Somewhat like watching a journalist write a ‘tell-all’ biography of a fictional character. Or something like that.
But don’t let me interrupt you. I want to see what the next chapter has in stall… 
Regards,
James
The simplest explanation is that James and SIATD had cybersex with PG before they both realized she is crazy and/or bad looking… which will always kill an erection.
I must say that I haven’t a clue what you are on about, I am not party to any practical jokes, I’ve no idea who PG ‘really’ is or for that matter who James really is. I didn’t invent either of them…
I have not had cybersex with PG, though she did offer herself to me recently…
Chained to the bed. Sadly the bed isn’t mine…
Damn - And I thought PG stood for ‘Parental Guidence’ which is ironic actually, now I come to think of it…
GTC,
Nice summary of Descartes in your .sig
I like it.
Thank you for the PMs…you know who you are…
As for the principal players’ responses, let’s take this the next step:
J2, are you thus claiming to have met PG? If so, then may we infer that her assessment of you is correct: Effeme…boring…impotent…virgin…what else did she say? Are these mis-characterizations of you? Please do feel free to elaborate. And if you really did meet PG, then feel free to share with us something something about her: personality, age, looks…
Go on, J2…get that PM in gear with “PG” and try to decide your next move…it’s okay, we’d love to see what you come up with…
PS
If I ever felt compelled to give you more credit–gotta earn that, son–I’d think your Freudian slip of “what the next chapter has in stall” was a clever play on words. Till you can demonstrate otherwise, we’ll leave it as a slip and await your contribution to the next chapter…if “PG” is wrong and you do, in fact, have some testicles to talk about…
For your information:
James No.2 and PhilosophyGirl share no IP addresses. If they are the same person, then different computers are being used.
PhilosophyGirl has been banned from ILP so you won’t get any answer from her.
All the best,
Ben
Thank you for the information, Ben. The banning of PG will put a wrench in things–till s/he comes back with another alias…–but J2 can still shed some light on the matter. Balls are in your court, J2. This is one context where you can use “dribble” and “balls” in the same sentence and not be about it, J2…
Why did she get banned?
Why wouldn’t she get banned?
Well… I can see where you’re coming from but I mean… PoR