For all the worry about the loss of effective checks and balances, even if, the focus of debate has been reduced to lack of transparent into the relation between rules of engagement and as It effects procedural insight, - the result surprisingly leads to a self correcting economic tool already in place.
Everybody knows lawyers lie out of their teeth on principle to define and defend a point of view, by conflating them by points, principles of law, which can apply to issues given wide latitude of interpretation.
But economic basis of selecting the most profitable and expedient ways of applying them to their objects if inquiry leads them to the appropriate course to go.
The economic litmus test determine this course, whether it is to fact it in shorted out, or long term buying in of derivitable securities, such as represented by hedge funds.
It’s the economy , stupid that undarlays the veneer of justification, and it is quite imaginable what would Trumpism look like if faced with a very different economy other the one now supposedly enjoyed today.
There is too much traction of economic stability, to upset an a status quo, as political diversions are maintaining the current standoff.
That is why, unless the situation changes suddenly, as predicted by our current vocal members here at ILP , that an economic crash is imminent, things are likely go on unaffected by the current harrowing partisan clash.
The checks and balances are formal effects infused by the processes of market place predictions, and those may appear strictly based on intelligent gut level guesses, but what they really , by virtue of their functional applications to derivative logistics, are litmus tests that correlate prediction and market activity by use of the most available substance, the committing of the buy and sell orders
.
So lets wait and see, if , during this political crisis,how the market will behave as an indicator of appearent foreshadowing of what bettors really think will happen in the foreseeable future.
There are bets on conditions by betting agencies as well, that can check , but balancing appears primarily from where the real money is going to, and right now, imminent doom and gloom are not on the horizon.
The generated hoopla is already more a preview into the coming attractions of how the next election will pan out, rather then a matter that concerns an immediate removal of the president.
Its becoming a political party struggle to ensure long term partisan power.
The smart money goes with the sustenance of the present status quo.
Everything is prefigured short term at least six months in advance, and situations allow that much time for corrections.
Right now, there is no real immediate call to justice, as all the parts of the argument have been put out.
The executive becoming overly authoritarian , even in the face of an impeachment, is morphing into a bipartisan political issue around the prospects of the election, rather then relating to the question of whether Trump is counter productive to the right interpretation of the Constitution.
The message coming down is to do with the appearent desperation of the parties to regain power.