About 8 years ago, I formalized a solution to ethics that I spammed to many people (as I’m want to do for better or worse) which was: if you make it extremely easy to kill others and to be killed by others and make it extremely easy for others to kill themselves and you to kill yourself - then whatever survives by definition represents inherent purpose to live - thus the perfect solution to ethics using the definitions on themselves - what that would look like is anyone’s guess - but that wasn’t the point of the argument.
Then I realized that it’s more nuanced than that, that this solution doesn’t take into account the fantastical - situations of reality where if missing would result in more (or any) death than necessary for the formulation above. I had missed that part 8 years ago.
If you can section everyone off to live in their ideal world in a way that doesn’t harm them, and all the existents in that world are so valuable that they would never harm them, then you have a better system.
You just demonstrated it yourself, you didn’t actually pin it on me…
Someone asks what is the meaning if life, whatever existents are seen as too valuable to destroy, represent the answer to that question.
If you want to find out one way what is truly valuable, make everything as easy to destroy as possible and see what remains… However, this is also a delusion of meaning… If you can make everything so valuable nobody wants to destroy it, then you have created much more meaning than the law of the jungle.
It’s a flawless proof Trixie, and the meta solution to ethics itself.
I am not crazy - all if those statements support each other and there is no other possible solution.
Your problem is that you think existence can be destroyed … Which I proved in my post is impossible.
You lash out at anyone who says it can’t be destroyed. If it was destroyed, past, present or future, I could not type or send this message because I am an existent, if it were destroyed, I couldn’t be here.
That’s a separate issue, I think. I thought your post was about people mass murdering each other for no reason, and not about the formation of the universe kind of things.
Not enough can. If life is easy then no new thresholds need be, no new ways or thoughts, no desires or hope. Evolution needs poking and prodding. We did not get to this point by having it easy. Look at creatures that face zero challenge.
No need to adapt or change. Let’s look at what medicine is doing to viruses and bacteria, they are adapting and changing due to mass medicating. Antibiotics are becoming useless. They now have to make new.