Some thoughts.....

Philosophy Forums Philosophy
1

“If time as we know it doesnt exist, then all changes of energy are done now”

Forget you clock, and time…thing of everything as energy, there you go.

“love is infinite and depending on how well you are at creating it”

i meant by this that you can spin up thoughts, which will give you an emotional sensation of love, only your imagination and daily need of food, drink and sleep and biological nature sets the limits.

Mind you I dont have any educational qualification background for this, and its based purely on my own research and how I imagine things. But I do have my life, which ought to be enough somehow :wink:

Thanks

2

I do believe that we are all energy but I also believe that we are all at different levels of consciousness. For example a cell is on a different level of consciousness where time and its way of life are completely different than mine and yours. You can feel no empathy for a cell yet they make up your entire body. However cells are eventually broken down into atoms and so forth… strings possibly.

I do not agree with the fact that time does not exist in your world. However it is not societies conception of time. I believe that time is only relevant to each living being. For example take the concept of Light Years. Somewhere there is a galaxy 1 million miles away. You only perceive that object 1 million years in the past. Now take that concept and apply it to everything that you see in your life. Every person you see theoretically that you consider to be the present would actually be presented in the past. So then the only thing that you see or perceive technically would be the past. If you believe this then you are truly alone in the world.

However i do believe that there is a force of perception that all humans posses that allows people to connect on a level that we call love. But then the question arises. Is love a sense such as sight inside our bodies as an ability to communicate with each other or is it something more?

Like you as well i also do not have any qualifications to speak of. I just have my experience and thoughts.

3

…without ‘experience and thought’ where would we be?

4

your observation about time reality is right regarding the fact that present is you as free move alone stillness or a fact of futur realisations means when your free moves are meaning a geniun actualisation of true positive reality from existing abstraction fact entity, when the move is meaning to realize something this is where the notion of time occur, so actually there is no notion of past in truth only present and futur, it is the futur of what the conscious is its source as a fact existing abstraction freedom, and not like truth that is the certainty abstraction itself freedom existing moves
the fact that the conscious is a true entity fact abstraction too outside truth existance abstraction moves, as being a relative abstract free entity and not an absolute one abstract entity like truth since it is related to others existing objective abstraction facts of truth that operate absolutely free while that relative entity is related objectively and subjectively from its ways possibilities to truth

that relative entity definition of conscious is actually a free entity of truth that assert truth being alive, you cannot see the truth from inside of it but as true free moves entity you are the truth relatively present life

so conscious is about freedom moves sense that mean something relative to it on different level of its reality that it occurs

and conscious is also then about the need to detach yourself from the flow of absolute truth free moves to manage to order your standing still while you operate the free moves for your own individual means actualisations

so past belongs to lies and never truth, it is mainly about the inventions of selves detached that enjoy the detachement result and never mean anything really

apparantly we can observe it in gods there is a true pleasure to be detached from truth, maybe the sense of freedom from freedom truth, i see it related to the sense of pleasure in being free truly but without doing what true would have to do mostly, which is to love freedom truth as the essence of willing to be free as relative to, so it is like they invent another free life and maybe their pleasures mostly are justified of what they escaped the truth, which explain why the pleasure seem to be lost when they reach in using as a base to realize powerful lives existance that become their reality true sense of free moves, and can explain then the idea of pleasure in killing someone true even if it is a such small abstract cell

it is surely weird to love freedom truth itself in a sense, as well as it is impossible to mean free true moves as existing independant abstraction entity without meaning principally freedom truth realities

it is weird to love freedom truth because you would never realize it for sure and it is always ahead, so that free move sense for freedom truth is not meaning a self and if it can mean to become true reality freedom but it cannot mean it when it is acting as freely moving it is surely for freedom truth without any interaction with , so it is true love , which show what love is about true superiority reality and not meaning itself superiority reality
it is impossible to mean true existing moves without meaning existance truth because what is relative is to what is absolute reality, even if it means relativity of its absolute existence freedom entity moves , while truth is always ahead so the means of relative are only hypothetically held and not meaning to be real at any moment
as if it means that truth mean that too and march according to truth terms always, that is why who are truly moving usually can drop everything they reached to do for truth they realize objectively existing if their terms differ , and that is why also they act as happy moving freely for any objective reality living for itself

do truth love anything? i dont think so and that is why i think the love of conscious to truth assert its relative abstraction being superior to absolute truth, asserting the principle of absolute being applied to life truth, who is more free as truth the most is the less living and who is the less free as true is the most living, but who is more free should be more true objective realisator and who is less free is more true subjective realisator, as who is more free is more truth freedom and who is less free as conscious is more to living true because of his relative reality positive free moves

so yes it is the love element which mean truth life that allow the connections of different conscious being a present reality one, from what each conscious could see of the other expression a reality with truth that he actualize being present with him, while the energy of that actualisation should be free from loving truth as a living true that has nothing to do really with his true identity one existing alone

5

love as free move justification, is actually the most true sense of living
freedom moves are absolute justifications of positive abstraction existance
the true freedom of freedom truth, freedom square actually is the sense of life, but that is how we got evil life too
love is the true life freedom realisations so its path is first from loving objective freedom truth realities before seeing the connections with itself as subjective conscious true existance which could make rise a sense of love more realistically true of its subject conscious existance is free about realizing

6

Maybe you ask that question from the perspective that they provide you the means to get what you want. You can always get what you want utilizing and developing experience and thought in certain areas of the physical. No matter where you venture with your wants you will discover that much of what you want is what you have been told.

7

love is the absolute living sense that become something else, living sense is of freedom square that could be true when it is free appreciations to truth freedom as being real also true, but without particular means while conscious of being real,
but that sense of living true is also of loving truth as superior that it is meaning to follow in order to sense life as conscious reality ones, from that reality abstract with superior reality life, so there are the means to profit from what is superior which is normal sense especially because it is truth superiority sense that assert the inferior being simply true and not else

but true love is something else when the conscious love truth absolutely, which means that the conscious never mean to take from truth anything and dont mean to follow but mean to witness it living and living itself from what it sees what it value a lot living and only that

now the difference between subjective relative reality true love and objective absolute reality truth love from a conscious is huge, i think what gods seem to say is that this would be the reference of life truth that would identify all conscious forms realities means

because it looks like all evil livings that mean to be free out of truth freedom, has a weakness to be true by loving their subjective existance entity out of truth life, they are happy in realizing their free life out of truth life but at a certain point especially also when they reach to realize certainties of existing away of life truth, they sense the need to be true subjectively for true living sense of what they realized so their needs to be related to truth subjectively is always there

8

sorry for repeating myself here but just one point i wish to add, it is like love is the superior sense life, as it is true superior sense life than it is a full living sense by itself alone, it looks as if it is related to truth life itself, the love of superiority is the sense of freedom moves realisations absolutely, that become like a flow of energies that cant stop doing, in freedom there are a lot to say about superiority it wont stop, and here we are at the bottom hole counting warms we got to eat

9

and that what explain also why evil powerful livings as gods too they mean their true living sense after they realized a lot, it is like they think deserving their relation with truth superiority from what they assert existing alone, but also like if they think being superior enough to pretend being loved for

but it is a real problem what truth reveal like that only who loves superior realisations for itself which mean not necessarly meaning to realize anything and never meaning to gain any reality from, but just the appreciation of superior realisations objectively as else is the sense of true living as life truth freedom means, it is a problem because noone is like that so then monsters would always rule and true potientials of living as living rights would be always destroyed and ruined in suffer till their death that make the pleasures of powerful ones