Still more of the same, over and over again and again?
I have explained +/-=+/- philosophy scienceā¦it worksā¦it explains how full logic binary signals are produced in the cosmos.It explains how you are able to see,hear and feel things in the physical.
+=- and -=+ half logic philosophy science doesnāt workā¦.apologies ā¦pseudoscienceā¦lol
Move on ProfessorX ā¦..itās good news because we can now explain the psychologicalā¦..chin up.
Mainstream pseudoscientists have never been interested in the psychologicalā¦.why would theyā¦..These self confessed deluded psychotics donāt believe the individual exists which is precisely why they donāt understand the psychological,consciousness and their relationship to it.
Theyāre a bunch of religious cranks/crack pots.
In what way is there life in psychotic religious cranks/crack pots who believe that they are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion)?
There is no life in binary processing biological machines which exist because they need to exist to claim that they donāt exist.
These lifeless machines donāt control consciousness.
1 Like
Perhaps the problem is the binary base of Jupiterās system. They have to be completely wrong. They canāt have made some false assumptions here or drawn some false conclusions there. No, they are completely wrong. It doesnāt work. Inventions based on pseudoscience that work must be coincidences or arenāt really working. As Jupiter says all mainstream scienceās theories are wrong. Not some, all - with the exception of motors and computers. Well, the latter, sadly for his position is a real, real problem for his hypothesis.
OK, after setting the ground state here, letās be as charitable as possible and see if we can get a meaning out of this. It seems a bit like saying Engineering good, particle physics and cosmology bad (speculative). We might end up with something like: Science that depends on self-referential mathematical abstractions detached from direct experimental control becomes speculative and ideological, whereas science grounded in stable oppositional interactions that produce repeatable technology remains genuinely empirical.
A kind of extreme instrumentalist critique of science.
The main problem with this argument is the very examples he gives depend on the sciences he denies validity to. Yes, programming may be binary and (beyond my paygrade) somehow be ok in his system. But the actual devices depend on and fit with the very science he has problems with. Computers are work because portions of them do NOT follow classical physics. Semi-conductors work due to effects not possible under classical physics. They also, to a lesser degree, rely on relativity phenomena - they need gps, which is calculated with special and general relativity included. Or they would no be accurate. Theory led to hardware. Quantum theory led to transistors. Relativity to gps. Particle physics led to modern chips (all easy to find out about if Jupiter doubts any of this).
Now I suppose all theory could be wrong but with great luck the tech that came out of it works. Thatās a hypothesis. And it has remained so for quite a while here at ilp.
I think he would need to be saying something coherent and meaningful to be wrong about it. Heās not even doing that. Saying ābinaryā and ā+/- = +/-ā over and over isnāt any kind of scientific theory or coherent claim to anything.
ProfessorX, you donāt get sounds,visions and sensations unless you have binary electrical signals.
In other words, you wouldnāt be able to hear,see or feel the external unless binary electrical signals were converted into sounds visions and sensations ā¦.its no different to how tv works but with the sensations added and you existing in 3D reality as a player NOT an observerā¦.
The religious cult of mainstream observer pseudoscience canāt explain reality ProfessorXā¦..because itās founded upon a half logic starting philosophy.
Keep trolling, no one pays attention to you other than to laugh. I am surprised you are still allowed to post your troll nonsense here. You havenāt actually made a single coherent claim this entire time.
lolā¦.oh they pay attention alright!!!ā¦itās you thatās trolling me.
The philosophy and science I explain is soundā¦
All the cosmological and particle physics theories that you believe in have all failed remember because itās all founded upon an incorrect religious belief starting philosophy concerning good and bad moral absolutesā¦..we all know that.
This is my thread by the way.
I had to enlist AI help to make a decent guess what heās on about. I tried to triangulate that with him by asking a lot of questions, to see if the guess was right. But he doesnāt seem to understand that interacting with other people is the only way to communicate, unless heās going to flesh things out and be clear. But he seemed to have no interest in interacting. Just telling. One these own worst enemy type situations.
He assumes that anyone who doesnāt immediately agree is his philosophical enemy which gives him the right to insult them and assume other things also. I love alternative theories and I am critical in paradigmatic ways of modern science. But there are only so many insults Iāll wade through when someone canāt bother to read and interact with what I write to them.
Just because an N and S pole is part of the same electromagnetic field of a spinning object doesnāt mean that they are the same.
When you take two spinning objects with N and S poles you get 4 off possible interactions NN,NS,SN,SS.
These attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force interactions do not cancel out in the cosmos.
So the religious cult of mainstream pseudoscience lies by claiming that they do.
The cosmos creates binary code and sends signals to the biological machine body which translates those signals into sounds visions and sensations such that the individual can hear,see and feel in the physical.
Itās not that I donāt listen to individualsā¦..Iām just not remotely interested in religious cult pseudoscience because I know how reality science works.