Sources of information and the creation of "normal"

Related: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=183819
Related: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=183612
Related: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=178066

Our subjective reality is shaped by the information we gather. If ones store of knowledge consists only of information that has been given to them by others then ones subjective reality has been shaped for them by someone else. It then follows that if ones only sources of information are authorized outlets then the authority giving the information has shaped ones subjective reality.

Where does your information come from?

Normal means conforming to the standard or common type. Whatever is most common is what is considered normal. It then follows that ones stored information determines what one believes is normal. Therefore, if ones information is passively received only from authorized outlets of information then ones conception of normal will be formed by the authority giving the information.

  1. There are at least two types of reality.
    1.1. Objective reality.
    1.1A. Objective reality is concrete, a set of facts outside of any one persons perception, that encompasses all data.
    1.1B. Objective reality is absolute truth.
    1.2. Subjective reality.
    1.2A. Subjective reality is an individuals interpretation, or perception, of this set of facts that exists outside the mind, and is filtered through the mind, senses and cultural conditioning.
    1.2B. Subjective reality is individual perception of the absolute truth.
    1.3. It is impossible to have a complete knowledge of objective reality.
    1.4. In order to do so one would have to know everything.
    1.5. One can only have a subjective view of reality.
    1.5A. This is shaped by the bits and pieces of objective reality one has gathered.

  2. Culture is the behavior and beliefs characteristic of a certain group.
    2.1. This is a common illusion of objective reality or a common set of myths (mythos).
    2.2. It is a force that works to shape a common subjective interpretation of objective reality amongst its members.
    2.3. This mythos determines what a group of people consider to be normal.
    2.4. The mythos is constantly evolving.
    2.5. The mythos is created by the most widely known information present within the culture.
    2.5A. Those with the ability to disseminate information en masse determine the current mythos.
    2.5B. Therefore, those who disseminate information en masse determine what is considered normal.

  3. Information enters the mind in two fashions. (See Chapter 1. How We Think. John Dewey. 1933)
    3.1. Actively.
    3.1A. This requires a passive source and active recipient, or an active source and active recipient.
    3.2B. This often involves critical thinking as a way to determine validity of information.
    3.2. Passively.
    3.2A. This requires an active source and a passive recipient or a passive source and passive recipient.
    3.2B. This often does little to determine the validity of the information.
    3.3. Both fashions are susceptible to invalid information.
    3.3A. An active recipient may be better able to determine the validity of the information than a passive recipient.

  4. Passive recipients of information within a given culture have had their subjective reality determined for them.
    4.1. This has been accepted as objective reality.
    4.2. Although objective reality cannot be known, passive recipients of information can be led to believe that the subjective reality culture has created for them is actually objective reality.
    4.2A. This can be accomplished by regulating the information which is given to the passive recipients.
    4.2B. The passive recipients do not understand this concept, it is not present among the information given to them.
    4.2C. Their subjective reality matches that of most other passive recipients.
    4.2D. This becomes normal, regardless of validity, because it is most common.
    4.3. Passive recipients receive information almost exclusively from authorized sources (e.g. schools, mass media, government).
    4.3A. Those in charge of these sources may have a motive unknown to the passive recipient.
    4.4. Subjective reality amongst passive recipients can easily be manipulated by those with the ability to disseminate and regulate information en masse.

  5. Active recipients of information may be able to interpret a subjective reality of their own which may be closer to objective reality than the common subjective reality of passive recipients.
    5.1. This can be accomplished in multiple fashions.
    5.1A. Independent study of bits of objective reality (e.g. replicable scientific experiments).
    5.1B. Independent study of a multitude of others’ subjective realities (e.g. investigative reports, book, etc.)
    5.1C. Ones own observations.
    5.1D. All of the above used in conjunction with critical thinking.
    5.2. Active recipients often gather information from a variety of sources, sometimes excluding authorized sources.
    5.3. Subjective reality amongst active recipients is much harder to manipulate.

Good OP, but i would point out noone is an entirely passive or entirely active recipient - everyone gets their information both ways. Even the most critical thinkers are spoonfed all kinds of information subliminally.

Sometimes, I would add, you can simply feel that you are in the nuthouse. From there, sure, all the above processes and being Active, curious, exploratory can all be helpful, but if you cannot trust your gut and or do not have a gut deserving of trust, these after the fact steps will probably end up being overall moot. In certain subcultures, we are not supposed to say this. No gut feeling something is fucked up should be valued. No, everthing is the Product of some rational analysis. Because what if everyone trusted their gut reactions - like they don’t already, though that’s Another issue. it is a modern taboo. REally, I made this choice because of logical process X. As far as I can tell the people who challenge norms either have experience negative with norms, positive with alternatives, or both and REALLY trusted and allowed to build their gut reaction that the norm was toxic, despite logic, despite research, despite other people’s claims and rationality, often for years or even lifetimes going against the flow of what seemed to be rationally supported.