So According to the Theory of Relativity time is not a constant when large mass or gravity affect space, essentially warping time and space. I don’t like this, time is a concept and has no physical properties such as space, which I can move in and observe by viewing the lack of objects between two objects or more objects. Now, does anyone know the logic behind how time is dilated and essentially warps? That just doesn’t make any sense. Maybe distance warps, but not time.
I always have problems with such theories, too, but they are just that: theories - I guess for time to be affected, it would have to be a tangible dimension and not just a conceptualisation of progression.
So how can time be a possible dimension?
Time is motion. A dimension is a location. Time, being motion, does have physical properties.
Isn’t time a marker, rather than a measure of motion? We don’t know what properties space holds until we get data back from probes, so we cannot be certain of any space/time distortion until we receive concrete data confirming those distortions - for now, it’s all theory…
Which are what?
Which is electron/photon relationships. Self-similar action infinitely. Time, as normally used, is a term of measurement. A watch or calendar are a few tools that we use, which ultimately confuse people on what ‘time’ is. Simply put, time is a measurement of motion.
Yeah I already stated that in my OP, which makes it a concept, not physical. Electron photon relationships are too vague, what do you mean?
Motion is the absolute perfect balance of non-spatial and the spatial. Electron’s ‘get’ energy from the photon. They swarm the non-spatial (where photons ‘surf’). A photon is a mass that is rotated into the non-spatial. The photon moves at the speed of light in the spatial, not at all in the non-spatial.
The non-spatial then moves relative to the spatial, which is relative to what specifically we are talking about (a person, a car). Not only are we talking about the speed something can move, we are talking about the speed something dissipates…or rots away.
There are infinite motions around you. Look at man-made numbers, now attach a MPH to each number. There are endless speeds or motions, both outward and inward.
Essentially that is just change, more motion, conversion to other masses. I don’t see physicality in motion, while electrons and photons move, that is electrons and photons moving… reducing our subject to submolecules and explaining movement on that level still doesn’t answer to me how movement has physical properties. The physical property is a photon which is moving sure, I get that. The physical property is the planet, which is moving through space. I also don’t understand what you mean by the absolute perfect balance of non spatial and spatial, do you mean that the relationship on a universal level is always equal?
…so, there is no time where there is no motion? is that the crux of what you are saying about the time/motion link…
That’s what motion is, change. The non-spatial has no change, photons do not age. Are you are asking how we get physical properties?
Well what are the physical properties of change? You listed photons, thats a physical property of light, not change…?
Via the concept of time we know photons of light from distant stars are so many years old. Now they don’t change, but we still assign the concept of time to their age, so I would say they do age by our methods of gauging time…
Megsj
Time is the interval between change/motion… but since motion is constant… time becomes the “space” between one state and the next…
Motion is not a constant there are different speeds.
You mean the space between states varies don’t you? 
Well that would be a result of motion.
Intervals are number-related, and numbers are man-made. We use math and numbers for easy definitions when all it does is make true Universal reality confusing.
Throw measurement logic out the window.
The Universe is binary. 0 is the non-spatial with endless 1’s being the spatial.
The trick to figuring out the Universe is to understand how something cannot begin or end. I liken it to the ‘magic eye’ pictures. Someone stares and stares and doesn’t see it. The guy next to them, after staring and staring, gets a quick glimpse and then loses it. After a while he is able to see it much easier.
So he tells the other guy how to do it, and he sounds like a nut “You kind of cross your eyes and not really look at a specific point and things blur a bit and then it gets clear. So because it’s blurry, the image is clear when the surrounding image is blurry”
Meanwhile the other guy eventually quits while you are standing at a mall kiosk with slightly crossed-eyes and a smile on your face.
So I’m looking at the Universal picture saying “Don’t think using mathematical logic. Replace numbers with motions and zero with the non-spatial. Now, insert the moving non-spatial to solve Einsteins spooky-action-at-a-distance and there you have it”
And I’m slightly cross-eyed with a smile on my face.
Well then after that I would think you see it my way.