I’m not sure what your way is. You keep referring to measurements.
I am?
Unless I’m misunderstanding you.
I think so.
You say time is not physical. I’m saying time is a man-made word to measure motion. In laymen’s terms I say time is physical. Well the word time is only a word, but the motion is real. The physical properties of change is the non-spatial moving relative to the spatial. It’s the ultimate Yin/Yang.
You say distance warps, distance is potential. It’s a measurement, which is time (laymen’s use of the word). So the way you see it, time warps. If an environment were to warp and alter the speed it allows, then time (motion) would be influenced.
Look at this- science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006 … omeres.htm
NASA will soon see Einstein’s idea of time was incorrect.
For every equation given as proof, one can give an equation to dispute it. That’s man-made math for you.
Motion is a physical change, yet time is a constant on our clocks here with the system we have set up. Motion is not time, time is a concept, thus I say time has no physical properties.
I didn’t mean distance warps, I meant spatial warping… If space is distorted so that something passing through travels a distance faster due to its distortion then it just traveled less distance, time didn’t change, the speed didn’t change, the spatial distance changed. Thats my problem with stating time changes.
I would agree that Einstein is probably wrong… all of his theory seemed to be taken for granted due to his predictions being accurate on some things.
Time is not a constant on our clocks, it’s pace is not perfect and the clock will erode. I agree with you that time is a word. I use motion when using it ‘literally’.
Now study Einstein’s spooky action at a distance. Now insert the non-spatial movement. Spooky problem solved, and the Universe therefore changed.
Meh, we have a clock that wouldn’t gain or lose a second by what is deemed over 200 million years, but for the most part since we’re discussing time the concept then it is to be at a constant regardless of clock failure… thus why time being distorted doesn’t make any sense. Motion being distorted is only distorted if space is distorted, so how we perceive the time pass during something like this would be our illusion, not an actual warping of the fabric of time, because there is no fabric of time. There’s must motion.
How long is 200 million years? The cesium atom will change as well. And the clock won’t make it that long, it needs help…It’s relative. It’s measurements.
Distorting space…space (laymen use of the word) is environment which is motion, allowed by the solution to spooky, etc. So, let’s have the two photons staying put (causing the photon detector to click every second) while the non-spatial is traveling at light speed, outward. No spooky action, but…we now have what phenomenon? We have an environment that has a speed limit, that changes as we dissipate.
We have an ever-changing environment without a shared ‘edge’. No defined shape, no boundary, we are not contained.
And help there is, we are constantly adjusting our clocks. The concept of time would not exist at all if humans were not around. There would just be movement.
“space (laymen use of the word) is environment which is motion” - This doesn’t make any sense to me. Space is space, motion is motion.
Space, literally, has an environment itself.
Space is part of the environment…
Yes, and therefore has an environment.
You’re both kinda getting it wrong…
If time is a messurement of motion… then it is the space between point A and point B… and relative
if OTOH time is motion, then time is constant at the speed of light.
depending on what you understand time to be… it’s either relative or constant.
Most people understand time to be a constant, it’s just what we’re used to, but we wish to use it to messure motion… so that understanding is just false… if we wish to messure motion by time then time must be the space between point A and point B and be relative… that’s how we get space/time…
“a year is the time it takes the earth to do a lap around the sun”
would become
“a year is the space that time travels through when positioned such and such compared to the sun”
Clearly the latter is a compleatly absurde use of the word “time”…
I’ve been saying time is a measurement the entire…time. Throw out measurements…
Well… then i guess you were right… 
congratz
Time is perceived differently, 5 minutes to me may be 10 minutes to you and time does not exist outside of the mind nor does it exist without a system of measuring.
you’ll all over the place…
So now you want to say that time is a messurement of some difference between states in a biochemical or neurological system and thus relative to each system?
No, thats just how it is experienced, differently.