Theosophy is an interest of mine. Alice Bailey, White Magic, (no thats not a rasial term it means magic at the behalf of the world rather than the individual) and the Astrology of the Rays are important to me. What Theosopy also explores is the power of Ahriman, the ‘bad guy’ in terms of ancient Zoroastrian morality - but what if Ahriman is just misunderstood? Heh - how could we, puny mortals, even in our solar genius, even judge such a vast being? Okey, so he is chaotic with respect to the normal codes we tend to gravitate towards. But should we not rather judge us in terms of his powers than judge his powers as abject? What are we going to do with that judgment? Live ‘beyond good and evil’ - but that is merely an upping of the game of code, yes vs no. It is a desperate act, a balancing act which from the perspective of more massive and stable powers would look rather futile. So the idea is not to try to surrender completely, that is impossible for a Being, so rather the idea is to find a way to surrender that portion of us which we can afford to surrender - allow to be submitted, to a portion of the Massive One that is worthy of a proper human destiny. Humanity cant, doesnt, go on in the trusted terms - what is being fought over now is short term priority on the crest of the wave of a hundred thousand years. But the bulk of that wave is, cosmically speaking, more interesting.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zuzCgN8pWk[/youtube]