StupidSmart!

Imagine a mind,
That was incredably complex,
But it cared only for the things which were useless,
And,
It misunderstood everything!

I call it: “Stupid-Smart!”
:laughing:

Have you seen any stupid-smart?

I’ll explain:

Life needs more than just IQ and math.
Computers can do math-fast, but they are still dumb.

Here’s what I want to see written on top of allot of books:

[b]"WARNING:

This scientist/achademia/professional/media-maker may contain compound or derivitive portions of stupid-smart! Stupid-smart is more hazardus to adults than it would be to children."[/b]
:laughing:

Check out the Edwards & Jukes family histories (psychology 101). Which family would you want to associate with and have your children associate with?

I sometimes get the feeling that the more conventionally “intelligent” people are the stupider they are - in fact there are some ways in which only intelligent people can be stooopid.

Almost like they use those extra options as containers for bigger and broader stupidities

Check out the squid and the whale and especially jeff Daniel’s character - great lit prof. but shit dad!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Squid_and_the_Whale

Intelligence and IQ are different things, also a degree of emotional intelligence is needed to be considered wise.
To solve problems, to give answers to questions can be a good things but only when the timing is appropriate or the definitive meaning can be misconstrued.

Culture,
Primarily the foot-prints of mob-psychology,
Setting glamor unto everything from body-piercings to entire lie-based-paradigms of thought.

This culture needs engineers.

The culture-engineer must do allot of mental work,
But he or she does not have to be right,
In the same way that people who work in a weapons-factory don’t have to be anything other than a worker.

The worker repeats the tasks given to him/her.
They are much like the automaton, but in this case, someone like a computer-programmer must do very-much math-like work, with his mind.

These kinds of work, and culture-serving, have nothing to do with quality. Instead, this has to do with quantity, strength and speed of the mental tasks that are assigned unto the individual via external sources.

Things such as theory, logic, view and deduction can be incredably complex, but, that will not make them correct or important, because their foundationalisms can still be rooted into un-important, or incorrect goals.

The goal is more important than the power put into the task.

Direction is more important than IQ, also.

One of the greatest problems that will arise in “high intellect cultures”,
Is this:

If it’s media too complex for you to understand,
That means you’re too un-intellectual.
“I can’t understand” = “I don’t know”.
That’s a dangerous process or system of self-judgment,
Because:

Imagine a very stupid person, lighting their selves on fire, etc.

If YOU saw that, YOU would be like thus:
“I don’t understand why they did that.
It doesn’t make any sense to me.”
But,
does that mean you “don’t know”?
Does that mean you’re “not right”?
Or, were you just incapable of their own psychological defect!?

“Awsome” things in culture, that large groups attend, are basically sensationalisms. They are excitory. One guy is trying to punch the other guy [boxing], and then the large group watches, and they’re like:
“Wow!”

But… does that mean ANYTHING?
Does that have “Purpose”?
Is that purpose circular?