It is indicative of an urge
to denigrate the self
in comparison to the collective
which posits that
populist or majority opinion
overrides individual valuation.
One should note, however
that associating oneself
with a recognised or popular
system of values
can be seen as a way in which
to legitimize oneself
through this association.
Therefore, can the weak-minded and inebriated
claim to possess perspectives of merit
through reciting what is commonly held to be
self-evident or immutable.
Thus attaining self-respect vicariously
through the admiration of their fellow
members of the flock.
But to say all that
is not to address the central
assertion of your disturbed mind.
That there is a Law outside
human fabrication of value
is to assert that laws and values
can exist inherent to reality.
These assumed “Laws”
are then discovered by humanity
rather than created by humanity.
This is seen as further legitimization,
as it removes these “Laws” from the human spectrum,
elevating them to a purported
“higher plane” of value
and thus incapable of being questioned
by humanity.
It remains a fact, however,
that these supposed “Laws”
have been fabricated by this mad imbecile
and that they are questionable.
I have done so…
I am satisfied that when I die
my body will dissolve through decomposition
into its constituent parts.
There will be nothing to tender payment to
or receive from.
Ideals, like all absolutes
are unreachable.
The proximity in which you end your life
in relation to your ideal
determines the value you will apply
to the result of your life.
The ideal of altruism
is a charming fantasy
which has no understanding
of human nature.
Tell me, mad imbecile,
where are Heaven
and Hell?
How are you aware
of their existence
and the conditions
under which one
is permitted entrance?
Dualism is a fallacy
which purports that
existence can be categorized
into 2 broad, opposing Forms.
This fallacy derives from human language
and has no meaning beyond
our system of compare/contrast
dichotomy.
For example,
darkness does not oppose light;
it is merely the absence of such
within our perception.
Similarly,
insanity and sanity
are values based upon
a societies notion
of what it is
to function successfully
within that society.
Or the capacity to repeat
the same action
and expect a different result
each time.
I would urge yourself
in particular
to consider this last
aspect…
Ah, and do you, dear mad imbecile,
hold the keys to self-realization?
Is this the sales-pitch
to your prospective cult members,
out there in the desert
pursuing the sustainable-living angle?
Do you offer to show
weak, desperate minds
the path to themselves
in turn for a monthly tithe?
Hmmm?
When determining what is real
I observe reality
through the medium
of my senses.
What is peculiar about reality
is that it is available to all,
can be analysed by all.
Therefore, the quality of ones interpretation
can be judged by all.
Whereas, when one posits a theory
based upon the fluffy rabbits bouncing around
inside ones head,
it is difficult for others to appreciate
the full value of this theory.
I’m sure you agree?

I would propose that
the value of a perspective
should be judged
by how it accurately describes
and purports to explain
what it refers to.
Given that damage to the organ of the brain
demonstrably impairs the function of the mind
it can be stated that
there is a correlation between
the brain and the mind.
Further, that the condition of the brain
is the condition of the mind.
That the mind is the effect of the organ of the brain,
the result of biological activity.
That consciousness is particular
to a certain organisation of material
which produces a certain effect
under certain conditions.
Therefore, my mind
will not survive
the death of my body.
Therefore, a mind
cannot be inherited
nor exist
without of the body.
The body is mortal.
The mind, too, is mortal.
It is a common social organisation
to organise by herd
or by pack.
When the wolves descend upon the fold
much blood is spilt…
The collective whereby
an individual weakling
is protected from the consequences
of his existence
by the support of his fellow weaklings
… is the herd structure.
Herein, a non-threatening little sheep
is appointed a position that carries with it
it’s own institutional power.
Thereby, said weakling,
though being impotent
may excersise the herds Will.
In a pack,
the hierarchies are organised such that
ones continuing efficacy
determines ones place.
This pack is an alliance
of predators
who feed upon the sheep
precisely because these sheep
are weak and easy prey.
It is a cost/benefit arrangement
based upon a risk/reward assessment.
As is the choice between becoming a sheep or a wolf.
