The vibratory nature of the in and out of the moment consciousness experience exists in reality,
Do you think all representations/interpretations of the “thing-in-itself” are false ones?
There are truths and lies in reality.We know this because many many individuals still claim that they don’t exist.
They are not aware that they need to exist to claim that they don’t exist.They are therefore liars if they claim that they don’t exist,whether they realise it or not.
You can’t have a lie if there is no truth it misrepresents (or hides behind).
My question is … when one species obviously looks like another species … how do you know which one is copying which? I bet there is some kind of criteria for that.
We are all embroiled within our own lifeless binary processing biological machine bot. which is programmed with binary software Ichthus.
This is a reality.There is no escaping it.
The connection sense between the physical (in the moment consciousness experience) and the metaphysical (out of the moment consciousness experience) is TOUCH.
Have you seen Michelangelo’s painting on the ceiling of the Sistine chapel?
¿as in… you have lost touch/contact with reality?
Yes….you could explain it like that.Thanks for that view.
1 Like
No. What you’re calling real is the phenomena of the senses. The theory of natural selection and neuroscience alone demonstrate that is not reality. It is a representation of your mind.Your senses have evolved to give you what you need. Perception is not a window on objective reality.
Control of consciousness also demonstrates reality….so you are wrong felix.You clearly know nothing about the vibratory nature of consciousness.Neither does cognitively biased mainstream science which has all now failed.
Rene Descartes claim “I think therefore,I am” is a cognitively biased out of the moment “trapped in your head” philosophy which only considers sound and vision and takes no account of the sense TOUCH.
Rene Descartes philosophical claim only confirmed that he had lost touch with reality.
He wasn’t a very good philosopher.
Jupiter123, your theory must provide you great solace. Who beside yourself accepts it and understands it?
Well you don’t Felix…that’s for sure….I don’t do theories Felix ….I do reality.
Ok then, to whom have you explained reality so that they understand it and agree with you?
Then you are stuck floating in a purely self-referential bubble, cut off from reality. Your words have no meaning, your concepts are without objective reference, devoid of meaning and your statements are arbitrary. You deny the very basis of rational discourse. So at this point, I don’t see a point in continuing to discuss things with you.
1 Like
You understand it Felix…you are just not aware until you are aware.
How can thoughts which only consist of sounds and visions represent reality when there are 3 other senses TOUCH…(taste and smell)?
TOUCH being the connection between the physical and the metaphysical.
“I think,therefore I am” is a misrepresentation of reality claim.
Rene Descartes wasn’t a good philosopher.
Actually, it confirmed he had contact with reality. He burned the nihil to the ground.
You actually agree with me and you’re just messing with everyone. Weirdo.
I’m no weirdo Ichthus..l’m just way way ahead of most when it comes to philosophy..
Rene Descartes did lose touch with reality.His claim “I think,therefore I am” confirms it.
“I think,therefore I am” is a cognitively biased philosophical claim.
He was stuck in his head.You don’t understand consciousness Ichthus.
Buddhism is a cognitively biased inward only meditative practice that has been rebranded but has been around from the start.You won’t find reality in a cognitively biased meditative practice only a misrepresentation of it.
You have a very unwhole description of reality.
No…I have a balanced view of reality Ichthus…..not an unbalanced view like Rene Descartes had.He didn’t understand the vibratory nature of consciousness and the fact that you have to take this into account in your deliberations.
Anyone can do inward only meditation….thats easy….inward/outward meditation is a completely different ball game….
He understood waves better than you do.
Muting this thread.
He didn’t Ichthus….I understand varying frequency electromagnetic binary energy waves fine….because I practice inward/outward meditation…..NOT!!! a cognitively biased inward only meditation.You can’t produce sinusoidal waves containing BINARY CODE!!! from nonsense cognitively biased mainstream scientific theories which is why they have all failed.You can only produce binary code if you balance attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force interactions.