In the fourth chapter of his letter to the Christians of Rome, St. Paul the Apostle implies that we are free to consider the ascendant angelic host holy if only the law that we find is reputed to us unto justice according to our faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. It follows that (to an extent) the law of God is both eternal and dynamic, and to add to the Word disseminated by Paul is it not the case that if one could not have faith in the ascendant angelic host when it is reputed unto such justice then we could not have faith in God at all. Therefore, when the law reaches us thus we may know that we are under God’s Providence and not that of Lucifer’s host.
The Word expressed in my post above is slightly incomplete. What I have written should read as follows:
In the fourth chapter of his letter to the Christians of Rome, St. Paul the Apostle implies that we are free to consider the ascendant angelic host holy if only the law that we find is reputed to us unto justice according to the teachings of Jesus Christ our Lord. Furthermore, to add to the Word disseminated by Paul is it not the case that if one could not have faith in the ascendant angelic host when it is reputed unto such justice then we could not have faith in God at all. Therefore, when the law reaches us thus we may know that we are under God’s Providence and not that of Lucifer’s host.
To make it clear, what I am hereby disseminating does not deny the eternal sufficiency of the Word expressed in chapter four of Romans amongst Christian peoples unfamiliar with the Gospel texts in the Holy Bible as existed widely in the past.
Isn’t this a philosophy forum? You know, all about critical thinking and stuff? If it truly is, my pictorial comment really couldn’t be any more appropriate.
This is the religion section.
Which states on the front: “For intuitive and critical discussions, from spirituality to theological doctrines.”
And states in the rules:
If someone wants to explore axiomatic considerations of a particular religion, such as the OP here, then that is perfectly in line.
Just simply responding with the same image twice when that image simply stands to belittle the value of the OP that the original poster holds to, is rather poor taste and not what the forum is really for.
The following clears up some confusion in relation to my above statement regarding the holiness of the ascendant angelic host. My apologies for posting work that is less than perfectly sufficient, hopefully my brothers will forgive me any grief that has befallen them as a result of questionable faith.
When we find the law reputed to us unto justice according to the teachings of Jesus Christ our Lord and his Father of our temporal and heavenly wellbeing we are free to know that we are under God’s Providence and not that of Lucifer’s host.
This passage expresses the highest Word of God known by man, the Word of the most perfect endless ascending holy Renaissance, the Word that now allows for the Kingdom of God on Earth which has been promised us. Amen.
