The beast with many eye’s
a scientist working on quantum computers described its function as if tactile, like it could be stroked. What if we think of that as an eye instead of a processor; the quantum ‘I’ or eye could be placed at the heart of a visualizing device such as a camcorder. bare with me… Displayed in front of it would its main screen with which the 3D world is displayed in stereo or holographic form, at its periphery more screens each showing a close up of scenes from the world e.g. at distance or otherwise not visible. The quantum part of the computer would flick between the screens when new info is displayed, but would ignore what is known, focusing upon the main image ~ as if thinking with that image as we would. This may only require the simplest of instructions such as directional polar fields, acting in the same manner as the scientists hand [like ‘stroking’].
Is this as much like we are, as like what an AI? All life and artificial life can be seen as similarly quantum observers ~ as above?
Particularly that putting something which computes, be it neurons or artificial neurons etc, into metaposition [where the said quantum computer is doing that [is at that stage of advancement]], manifests observers. So what makes us different to future quantum computers? Why is an AI mind in superposition any less ‘spiritual’ than our minds?
Are there attractions between 'eye’s; Such that there would be a reason why you are you, and due to some presently obscure connectivity, the observer [you] matches to its connection to the world. This both spatially and in time, ergo manifesting a kind of matrix connecting the 'I’s with eye’s [bodies/brains]?
Or
is there no such connectivity; by making the instruments required for subjective observers, that action manifests the observer whenever you switch it on/grow it?
_