Back up. Pain is not the intention. The original broken leg is not the intention. Resetting the broken leg is helpful, but hurts, but pain is not the intention.
So, no, it does not follow that people should go around breaking their legs for the pain of it.
You’ll probably consider me a masochist for even replying to you right now in which case you … are funny-annoying.
Which would be impossible if pain were impossible.
In that respect, yes, everyone who has a poorly healing broken leg, if the doctor recommends it be reset, should consent to have their leg reset. That’s assuming the doctor doesn’t go around breaking legs (or hiring people to do so) so he has something to do for money. In that case, a citizen under a government that allows such things should consent to be satisfied with a broken leg. In protest.
You’re missing the whole point. Nobody should have their legs broken in the first place. They should be given very basic teachings about the consent violation problem and the pleasurable exclusive access problem.
You ignore the root problem and spend your whole life apologizing it in the name of Jesus.
Did it ever occur to you that Jesus might agree with me instead of you?
Good parents teach our kids they already know how to treat others by asking them, “How would you feel if someone did that to you?” about stuff they like & don’t like. We teach them to share stuff they like, not hoard it all to themselves or expect everyone to share without even asking them first. We actually use the time we actually do have to teach/remind them. And it is in line with self=other, or as you prefer to call it, the rainbow rule. I can’t speak for parents who are generational hoarders of wealth or worked to exhaustion constantly—those folks really need to switch places.
How do you know what you like if you’re not allowed to not like anything?
It’s not that there has to be something bad in order for you not to prefer something. There only has to be a bigger liking that you prefer more than a lesser liking.
Liking is primary.
How do you know you like something? When you’ll give up other stuff you like… like being pain-free.
Dislike must be allowed, too. If all you have are greater/lesser likes, how can you dislike when someone acts in total disregard for your likes? Dislike is a kind of pain. A sensor that helps you respect others likes because you like when they respect yours and dislike when they don’t.
If Jesus agreed with you (the pretend you… gotta be) he would never have demonstrated his liking on the cross by symbolically taking all the dislike in our place.
I’m talking weird on purpose.
It feels like we have already had this conversation. I can have it 5,000+ times because it’s my favorite conversation.
Being discriminated for great ideas just because of your sex.
The war of the sexes…. Right.
It should always be the best ideas that come forth.
Even though I bizarrely (and I might add…. Absurdly!)
The singularity of lots of cosmic stuff as a white privileged male …. I know how women feel to be discriminated against for their ideas…. Just in the reverse way.