The Big #1 Theorem: correct/rationale vs. incorrect/incomplete?
- Yes
- No
- I don’t know
The Big #1 Theorem
-Robertson-
My theorem is that, at the root of all decisions in life, each individual looks out for himself by making decisions that appropraite conditions for his perception of success, happiness, and overall progression in life. Each individual makes decisions that make his position in life better (according to his own percept, which explains the varied decisions among people), or sacrifices a decisions towards his well-being in order to save it for later, like debt, to a person, in order to feel a moralistic emotion of the opposing partner having to set equal tides by returning the favor.
This theorem, then, will prove the motives and underlying themes behind all decisions made in life–given the right information to the viewer. The objective-viewer must view the subject as having more information than themselves, a reasonable suggestion, and that his analysis in deciphering his motives must be, in some way, incomplete. By asking yourself “why,” most of the roots to our very own decisions can be found, with an honest conscious and open heart.
Finding the motives of people is important: the media uses to manipulate, government to illude, religions to delude…
All the information regarding the Big #1 Theorem is not written here, but this is the fundamental basis. I want all viewers to do one or many of the following things–
(1) can you find a situation where, with the correct information given, a person’s decision cannot be deciphered that roots back to his individual interest?
(2) The only thing I have studied close to this is a parallel to Freudian Pleasure Principle, but besides that, any other works close to this? (this is mine, to reitterate)
(3) What does this, if you believe it true, say about our society? Has it evolved this way or was it this way in the minds of intellectuals throughout the course of history, or is it a result to the capitalist, self-interest, lassez-faire culture that allows for individual judgement and progression?