Nah, I’m just going to jump straight to ad hominem arguments now (oops, sorry for the Latin).
You’re a sad, stupid man. Actually, I don’t even think that qualifies as ad hominem, it’s just the objective truth.
Quit ignoring the proof I give you and stop thinking you’re being logical, or stop breathing my air.
Of course, you can’t have a big lie without a group of liars funding it. Obviously, if they all follow the same exact course, their lies aren’t going anywhere. So they admit to some of their lies and then promote other liars with crackpot theories to make it easier for them to lie to you again.
It’s the same thing with psychiatry/psychology. Many psychologists now hold the view that psychiatry is bullshit, only in effort to make the masses believe that they are the ‘truth tellers’, to attract them to the field of psychology. It’s all slingshot religion. It doesn’t matter what medium liars use to deceive the masses, the goal is totalitarian control. They have no problem abandoning other methods to make way for new ones. So eventually the liars will admit that psychology is bullshit and then try to attract everyone to a new quack science that they will use to control.
Here’s an ‘award winning’ psychologist admitting that psychiatry is a fraud:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-P6_FwpVo_s
Freud was a coke-head quack crackpot and his theories have done nothing but serve to separate society and drive everyone insane. Divide and conquer technique. That’s all that this stuff is.
Einstein was a liar and a plagiarist.
True, 100% accurate predictions are the fairy tales of liars. True prediction requires absolute control, when there is no such thing as control.
Nothing ‘bends’, it all just moves. You can call it bending, but since everything changes you’re not really changing a ‘default shape’, so it’s not really bending.
Light is everywhere and science has not proven otherwise, because it can’t.
I agree that he was a plagiarist, to a point. My point about him is that he didn’t believe in an expanding Universe, so he agreed with you, again to a point.
Yes, perpetual physics understands that all in the spatial is ‘light’. Light has four states and it’s internal geometry has been defined.
When I say that ‘light’ does not bend, I mean the ‘light’ most think of.
Only problem is fundamental particles do not exist.
No, they do not exist. The Universe is self-similar.
Wow, you can’t provide your own argument and revert to using someone elses bullshit theories and then you again assert that what you are saying has proof, when you can’t even prove that it is proof.
Wow, what a stupid sentence.
Look up the experiment proving that light bends. And Muscular Philosopher has a point; it is the medium that bends. Space time is bent in exactly the way Einstein’s theory predicts, which is shown by the apparent bending of two beams of light from distant stars. If you’re really too lazy to type four or five words into google to find the experiment, don’t expect me to do it. I expect that you’re also afraid of being wrong and that you won’t look it up.
Also look up how General Relativity accurately explains the orbits of the planets.
Also look up how time dilation experiments have been conducted.
What possible education could you have in this? What makes you think you can explain physics on a universal scale better than people who have dedicated their lives and monumental intelligence to the field? Do you really think you’re being logical? And what possible logical reason is there for a conspiracy? I’ll tell you it isn’t the money…how many rich and famous physicists have there been throughout human history?
Wow, what a way to make your point stronger! Does your ego have a custom pump I wonder?
“it is the medium the bends” - really you think so? Maybe that has to do with the fact that everything moves and changes?
THere is truth in everything, even a lie, I will admit, but Einstein’s theories are the stuff of science fiction. Actually, science fiction is founded on his theories. Science fiction and modern science are mutual supporters.
Time is a unit of measurement. Time does not exist. I really hope I don’t have to explain that to you. This is getting pretty lame.
I don’t believe I can explain physics better than physicists. Physics is just a tool, an estimation. It doesn’t predict or ‘control’ or know anything. It’s another tool that gets abused and worn down.
Yes.
The real question is how many people have physicists made rich? How many black slaves have made their masters profit?
I’m interested to know where you think Einstein stole GR from. If you can guess right, I’ll help you out.
Do you want to tell him or should I, Most Muscular?
By the way, here’s your proof of a pulsar, I should hope. You can’t deny that it’s pulsing, unless you’re going to say these scientists are conspiring and outright lying.
So, what then causes this pulsing anomoly if not the neutron star left behind from the supernova?
I think I’ve already stated that modern science is full of liars. What makes you think people can’t fabricate lies in science in order to gain power? They’ve done it before right? With “racism”. Evil whitey did that, right? So… why can’t they do it again with something else? Judaism, Christianity, Islam. Control is a religion. It doesn’t matter what it’s name is.
And what do you think they’re trying to control? What control does astronomy have over your every day life?
Not a whole hell of a lot.
Here’s some images of quasars, caused by black holes:
youtube.com/watch?v=wI39D1zQzis
See, there’s your proof, you just want to deny its existence. Essentially you’re saying that you’re more logical than everyone else, so no one can logic you into thinking that black holes and neutron stars are at least possible. In actuality, they make a lot of intuitive sense and match observations. Of course, you’re going to say that these observations are fabricated, so unless I can shell out a few hundred million on array radars and huge optical telescopes then I have no proof. What a racket you’ve got going.
Obviously if someone is bent on control and power and greed they’re not going to stick to just one tiny little field. But if you can control the ‘knowledge’ that people ‘know’, then you have quite a bit of power.
Careers have been built around your precious big hoax theory and black hole lies. So much money has been made. And look what happens when someone doesn’t agree with the big bang theory and black holes. (Look here for reference)
I don’t like the word denial, as most liars can use it against you in the negative way. If you say “i deny this” in some way they can just say “he admits he’s in denial”. I’m not in denial.
I see nothing in your video that proves any of the things I have mentioned exist. I’m supposed to just think “well I can’t really see what this or that is so I must be just stupid because the scientists at NASA know what they’re doing they’ve got degrees and stuff”. Doesn’t work that way with me, unfortunately for you.
Your ignorance is dazzling. How old are you? What’s your education?
Why are you always on about my personal info? Especially education, wtf does my education (which in your eyes is paroting what you are taught) have to do with what I know?
All the theories that are constantly being abandoned in the science field shows that education is really useless in helping you to be more self-aware and your ‘proof’ is based on faith.
I mean Jeebus… you are accusing me of being an anti-semite already JUST because I don’t believe in the big bang theory and black holes.