I was looking at some stuff and discovered that the majority of the black population in the united states (that typicaly votes democrat) is centralised in the south primarily in states that always go republican. so due to the electoral college the black vote for the most part ends up not counting.
IOW in local elections their votes would count. So it’s not like the unfair imbalance on the national level is countered by a favorable unfair weight to their votes on the local level. On the local level, without the electoral college idiocy, their votes count fairly - as do the votes of whites. On the national level, they do not count as they should. A net loss.
What are y’all talking about? Does voting now separate out all non-Caucasion votes in order to give some sort of advantage to one ‘race’ (identified only by their skin color) over another?
Oh, my lord. I thought we’d come a lot farther than that!
Talking about it in terms of “fair” and “unfair” incorrectly, I think, implies that it’s being done deliberately. As if it’s some plot by republicans or the white status-quo to move into states with large black populations and out-vote them so that their vote doesn’t count.
The fact that the presidential election isn’t won by popular vote is kinda weird, I agree. Is it a plot to silence black people? I doubt it.