Imagine in the age where a milk fed, nuke envying childish monster dictator, bred on Western trash culture, a video nerd of the most reprehensible kind, gains power over an empoverished populace willing to follow him into the grave>? Add a dash of ego
mania related to his not overly endearing caricature of himself as an antihero, someone who would be cast by a none too admirable role of having to endure
a film about him which calls for his assassination
The mixture calls for a total childish rage directed
against Hollywood, by a threat of a 9-11 type
payback.
Doesen’t this scene smell of a violent scenario of the
most regressed kind? Can anyone in today’s world
present a more mature response, as when the late Ronald Reagan ,joking about his image, oft burned in
effigy, as he understood was the cost paid ,by
people found in positions of corruption, a cost paid by for indulging in the vagrancies of preoccupation withabsolute power? Course children be they real or
politicians ,have to play out the scene of
of missed childhood in the best way they can.
They miscast the movie everybody is talking about,
instead of Franco, they should have signed the
dictator himself, or at the very least Chaplin, who played the Great Dictator with such flair, that is, if, he could be resurrected. What Jong is not, great at is
acting, or even more so, acting with comic relief.A smart dierector would have signed him, not
specifying which dictator he could have played, and
then, he would have been greatly flattered, instead of this.The writer should have his head examined. I guess he will be forever unemployable, and reduced
to the kind of work as those, of whom he only wrote
about.
