wendy52:
Eternal only belongs to the higher existent state being light. Creation is in the materialized state and that is aging and dying, so it has been leaving from the moment it was created, it is not moving into creation it is leaving it.
Hold on there’s a your mum joke in there somewhere…
wendy52
December 3, 2013, 5:10am
122
The argument is not personal, but you always seem to try to make it personal…what is your problem?
Everything is created because it is actualized, you cannot study a pre created state because it already exists. If it did not exist then what are you theorizing about…something that does not exist…you already tell yourself that it does not exist…what is wrong with your brain?
wendy52:
The argument is not personal, but you always seem to try to make it personal…what is your problem?
Everything is created because it is actualized, you cannot study a pre created state because it already exists. If it did not exist then what are you theorizing about…something that does not exist…you already tell yourself that it does not exist…what is wrong with your brain?
That’s what she said, see told you.
von_Rivers
December 3, 2013, 1:21pm
124
Why are you trolling, flaming, flooding, and derailing so hard all of the sudden?
Maybe he found out he was the troll all along.
Ben_JS
December 3, 2013, 9:32pm
127
Perhaps Hel’s happy, and that’s how he expresses his energy. Perhaps Hel’s effort is humor intended to brighten the mood of the forum in a creative way. Perhaps he slept with your mom, or more.
Perhaps I got my lad out started wanking and then realised that self love is apposite?
Helandhighwater:
Which is a direct contradiction of your assertion that it exists because it cant not exist. Which leads me to conclude that it not existing is not an axiom or a starting point from which I can induce existence and vice a versa nor is it necessary to the eternal nor does it have to remain consistent or be included, integral or conducive to be so, nor is a position you postulated with the statement of logic or its inference contingent on that or anything else in that post as aforementioned. Existence is not a priori and its not not a priori or is it.
Wrong, my friend. Its not-not-existing is part of its existence, but not the whole of it.
