Since you have nothing constructive to add then you should at least leave us believers with our happy illusions
Precisely. Within a generation we would have regressed back into the Stone Age.
Good government takes advantage of our natural inclinations. When we write out our idealistic Constitutions, what is natural gradually gets thrown out with the bath water. We end up with thousands of libraries filled floor to ceiling with law books, all trying to define how original constitutions wanted us to behave.
The most natural form of government is one of mutual respect and obedience to unwritten social ethics. The way you achieve this without breeding rebellious teenage protestants, is to rear and educate children to respect univesal family values. There are seven of them, and if parents made sure each one is properly seated by age 21, we would have a self-policed, hadr-working population that does not need bureacratic oversight, or any other supervisors tell them how to behave. Such a New Age generation would clearly see the whole of mankind as a single family all sharing the same values. And we would all work together to steward the home planet as a single family estate.
I had some moments like that in my teens. I worked out a detailed plan on how to execute a perfect bank robbery.
As to courage let me warn you, if it is on the wrong side of ethics, the end is worse than having the courage to face the devel and be damned. An abyss of puss lays beyond that.
Indeed. The most effective form of slavery is that which causes the slave to believe he is happy.
Conflict and inequality are necessary; many beautiful things in this world have sprung from them. Your naive and idealistic utopia will result in stagnation and decadence, nothing more.
Yeah! The planet management progects that are needed right at this moment are so vast and so complicated it will take generations of collective creative effort for them to become a reality. And when we have this planet running in perpetual motion with only maintanence needed, I can play golf every day on any course of my choosing without feeling guilty about starving kids. I want nothing more,
Conflict - and, through it, overcoming- is creation.
Subsistence is stagnation.
You do not want to create; you want a soft, easy life in which all your cravings are met with the minimum of expended effort.
You want ease; and to be spared any hardship.
Were you not coddled by the decadent society in which you live (which survives and prospers through the existence of minds such as your own), you would be dead long ago.
I got done with arts and crafts class in nursery school
I was done with bows and arrows by puberty
I was done with dogmatic religion by my teens
I was done with pseudo-intellectual argument ( like this one) by 21.
I am now wanting to harvest the 5 billion KWH of lunar energy that is going to waste twice a day in the
Gulf of California.
When my work of carrying the globe on my shoulders is done, I look forward to a nice game of golf.
[/quote]
Were you not coddled by the decadent society in which you live (which survives and prospers through the existence of minds such as your own), you would be dead long ago.
[/quote]
It is time you left nursery school.
*EDIT: After some more consideration, I feel my actions may have been rash. I’m only human . So I’m unlocking the topic. But I still think Dorky had a good point.
I bask in the radiant splendour of your obvious superiority. Do tell this woeful ignorant how to be such a magnanimous, gifted, higher type such as yourself …
=D>
@Carleas: This thread was doomed from the get-go. Political idealism is futile.
There are two sides to your brain. You have been trained to use only the analytical half. The intuitive side is where all inspiration lies. It needs exercise or it atrophies. If you really want me to tell how, we need a change of tone, here and in the political arena.
Carleas, thanks for the unblock
Hopefully we can get to the nitty-gritty of the politcal mind-set
It depends on the sincerity of our enquiry/
I don’t know anything about Apaosha, except that we share a distaste for your lies. We reinforce each other, which is something your theory lacks: support.