If this is what you really want to believe and maintain here, then okay.
I defined the word ‘space’, which aligns with your claim that objects are so-called ‘within’ ‘space’.
you, however, have the belief that the Universe is finite. And, this is why you cannot fathom and comprehend anything opposing this belief. Again, beliefs stop people from being able to ‘look’ and ‘see’ clearly, and the Truths in Life.
Also, remember that it is ‘you’ who is just saying, “No, what you say is not true”. Again, this is because of your ‘current’ belief, which you obviously have not been able to back up and support at all here.
LOL Remember that it is ‘you’ is saying, “No, ‘space’ cannot go on forever”.
Although, and again, you have not yet provided a single thing that could back up and support this belief of yours, at all.
LOL, LOL, LOL
I have explicitly stated that saying ‘space’ is ‘physical fabric’, which is what allows objects to exist, while also saying ‘space’ is ‘empty’, which is what allows objects to exist, is A CONTRADICTION.
This JUSTIFIES how your statements and claims ARE CONTRADICTIONS.
Once more, you just cannot see and comprehend this JUSTIFICATION because you are blinded by ‘your beliefs’.
I have NEVER stated this anywhere.
But, if you really do want to believe this, then go ahead and show exactly where and when I stated that.
Here is the ‘red herring’ or ‘strawman’ again. I have never even implied anything about ‘filled and empty’, let alone said it anywhere. you introduced this so you had something to refute or reject.
I have also pointed out that ‘a room’ has a boundary or endpoints, which once again are ‘physical objects’, and which has absolutely nothing at all to do with ‘space’ itself, which has NO all-encompassing physical boundary nor endpoint.
Also, previously you stated that ‘space’ is both ‘empty’ and is comprised of ‘physical fabric’, which is obviously CONTRADICTORY. The word ‘filled’ you now introduced to ‘try to’ fool and deceive the readers here.
Who cares.
you have claimed that ‘space’, itself, can end without ‘physical objects’.
Show the readers here that you are able to stay focused, and show the readers how ‘space’ could end without ‘physical object/s’, exactly.
Okay.
Apparently, ‘I’ do not understand ‘this’.
But, what ‘I’ do understand is that you believe, absolutely, that the Universe is finite, while you also ‘try to’ claim that ‘space’ can end or be bounded without a physical object or without physical objects.
So, let the readers see how this could even be a possibility, then ‘we’ can and will look into if it is an actuality, or not.