Yes, gravity is not going to help in this different example. 
I consider this to be a happy coincidence.
Your comment seems to imply that this “happy coincidence” is an insignificant anomaly of chance. But “chance” is merely a word that we assign to events that we do not understand. It is my belief that my “oyster experience” was a product of the phenomenon of entasy. The “oyster experience” is a product of the same phenomenon which makes constructive, orderly events emerge from supernovas and black holes, the same phenomenon which makes biological evolution emerge from DNA replication errors, which makes mindless geological activity produce the ordered structure of diamonds. My point is not that the “oyster experience” is some kind of spectacular miracle, any more than a snowflake emerging from random atmospheric activity is a spectacular miracle. My point is that synchronicity is not an anomaly of statistics but a product of a particular cosmic phenomenon.
The point of the analogy is not to convince you that this kind of dice behavior is possible, rather the point is to make you think about what makes it not possible. You say “It’s justs how it is,” but that does not really explain why it is how it is. There is nothing in science or mathematics that explains why dice behave the way they do. All we can do is throw dice many times and then make certain generalizations about the outcome; but science knows nothing about the forces behind the outcomes. My entasy hypothesis does not attempt to supplant some pre-existing conventional knowledge about the throw of dice; it attempts to propose knowledge where there is no knowledge at all.
How is this anything new? You’re merely paraphrasing an age old philosophy of ontological monism. It’s also known as “dialectical monism” or “unity-of-opposites”.
Your chaos is yet another name for YIN, or DIONYSUS, or FEMALE.
Your order is yet another name for YANG, or APOLLO, or MALE.
Your entasy is yet another name for CHI, or LIFE FORCE, or ELAN VITAL, or BEING, or GOD, or UNIVERSAL ONE, or SUPER-CONSCIOUSNESS, or . . . need I go on?
You should check out Walter Russell and his cosmology. He has some fancy terms. Your chaos is his radiation/expansion/centrifugal/magnetism and your order is his gravitation/compression/centripetal/electricity. Your entasy is his stillness.
The two-way vibratory motion between compression (tension) and expansion (release) is a real aspect of reality, but the idea that the universe is fundamentally a unity is not.
The universe is flux. Fundamentally, this means it is chaos. Superficially, this means it is order.
I don’t deny that my entasy model is similar to some other philosophies. I even wrote a chapter in the book called “Entasy in Religion” in which I discuss some other religions and philosophies that are similar to my model, such as yin and yang. I don’t see this as plagiarism but rather as corroboration. I see the connections to other philosophies as evidence of a shared intuition about the nature of reality.
We can see the dichotomy of order and chaos in many ancient cosmogonies. This relationship plays a large role in the Biblical creation story. Many Christians understand that the universe was created ex nihilo – out of nothingness. However, this is not what the Bible indicates. Traditional translations say: “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth . . . .” However, a more accurate translation is: “When God began to create the heavens and the earth, the earth was without shape or form . . . .” This translation eliminates the implication of creatio ex nihilo, and also emphasizes that the creation was an act of turning chaos into order, rather than making order out of nothingness.