Aren’t we all missing the obvious: alt energy exists.
The evidence for it multiple different forms is overwhelming. Literally just use google once.
Bizarre waste of time thread.
Alternative energies do exist but are insufficient as I have said to the demand and consumption of modern infrastructure.
Modern infrastructure can’t sustain itself with current alternative energy methods.
So wrong the bus I’m on just screeched to a halt.
So, prove it buddy. Show me a large city powered only by solar panels or wind turbines.
Lol
You can’t do it.
It’s funny cause you consider those alternative forms of energy. Sort of like how python is an alternative method for C# code.
This is what I mean, dude. Close ILP and go surf the net for a while. You’ll learn stuff.
No viable alternative source of energy exists today to replace petroleum. As I said, nuclear could have been a way, but they had a couple of catastrophic spills in the experimental stages and pussied out.
Sun? Wind? Not with the technology we have today. Obviously they are sufficient to fuel a home and a car (maybe not even), but Joker is talking about mass production and transportation of goods and people. That you cannot do with anything but petroleum in today’s world.
Unless the engineers can come up with something new.
No… I meant i’d be an armed guard of the caravans youd try to rob.
Pezer understands what I am saying here.
In my opinion nuclear energy on a mass scale is too dangerous for the environment.
It is simply not viable.
I want to start my own reactor, but I hear the empires get a little fascist when they know you’re looking for enriched uranium.
Your missusing the words again.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/YouKeepUsingThatWord
Lackey suck up.
You guys live in a goldfish bowl.
This is exactly why we need to be looking at population control. We either do it through attrition or through more catastrophic means.
Personally, and this is not to go to the sexist extreme that James will (James being a respected peer), I think one of first things we need to do is take control of birth control away from women. They are just too susceptible to baby fever. We need to find a way to easily and cheaply reverse vasectomies and have every pubescent boy have a vasectomy and have his sperm saved in a bank to be used at his discretion. Once men have a choice in the matter, that is outside of their sexual drive, I’m almost certain there would far more reservation about childbirth.
Plus that, it will give men a little more leverage in the war between the sexes.
Uhhh…
Stoic, what do the pictures have to do with the thread subject?
The totalitarianism of population control have a variety of social consequences and backlashes.
It would not be pretty. It really wouldn’t be containable on a practical manner.