The Feminization of Man

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
3021

What the fuck are you on?

Brains evolved to deal with the unforeseeable, in real time.

In the world you imagine, to help you cope with your bad judgments and bad choices, exposing your mind for what it is….

Brains are useless….big or small…..

Their only utility, according to you, is to heighten suffering, when the mind realizes it is impotent.

You’ve debunked natural selection…..since there is no advatage to any mutation, because it is all determined…so natural determinism…..

God, in other words. Big brains are part of a cosmic plan, unfolding.

And eternally repeating….

Dude, you have created a self-comforting delusion….but ti works, no?

Go away….if it has been determined.

3022

Ouch! Are you sure you’re a Greek?

You mean, the mirror image of your own ‘vice signalling’ or ‘virility signalling’?.. “Look at that great Satyr… What a bad-ass! Now that’s a real man…” :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

3023

Over 25 years ago I wrote an essay…posted it on sciforums……way back when it was a cool place.

Feminization of Man

As a specimen of “toxic femininity”….watch VictorMcCheeseEsq

She may sound like an ugly, disgusting cunt….but I assure you she is merely Jewish.

Definitely toxic…..but we never hear about those…we only hear about toxic masculinity.

We hear of male insecurities, and syndromes….never female ones, like penis envy….or disgruntled feminist Karens…..

3024

Yeah! I’m an American redneck and even I know how to spell it, Saully!

3025

And in the Greek, the difference is “even more pronounced”: Epimētheys (ΕΠΙΜΗΘΕΥΣ), not Epimēthios (ΕΠΙΜΗΘΙΟΣ)… (To be sure, modern Greek pronounces most vowels as an i (“ee”), and, moreover, English does pronounce the name as “Epimethius”, of course. Still, from an ancient Greek perspective it’s like calling Zeus “Zius”.)

Anyway, who says Victor is a woman? Only the crazy futureone, as far as I know. To me, Victor doesn’t come across as a woman at all; rather as a toxic-masculine troll. But maybe that’s their secret, even from themselves: maybe they’re a man on the inside desperately insisting that, because they’re a woman on the outside, they’re a woman, period…

3026

Victor is a 30+ year-old American father, who just discovered how to use sarcasm and condescension to defensively insult, and then deny the intent, preventing his face from being shattered.

It is the extent of his social etiquette, probably learned from his wife.

Now he’s a castrated modern, priding himself for being so well-adjusted and conventional.

A classic Homo Americanus midwit.

Nothing matters to him but his “family”….his pleasures…his day off.

3027

I can read people’s gender easy and they gave it away in certain responses.

RealUn also believes they are a clone account of “vegetariantaxidermy” who I believe was female.

You call me “crazy” cause I believe in reincarnation and you don’t. Ooga booga.

:orangutan:

3028

Feminization is necessary when there are no accessible frontiers, and human interventions prevent natural culling form maintaining environmental balances.

It is nature rebalancing.

The means will be demographic.

3029

Jesus. I go to another forum for a sec, come back to this forum and there’s like twenty hannibal lecters staring at me.

3030

Assumption 1: Men are violent
Assumption 2: Men also cant control their tendencies. (If there are no frontiers for men to vent their violence, men will pose a danger to society)
Assumption 3: The feminization of men is a natural and not an artificial process
Assumption 4: The process of feminization will achieve a balance and not the complete collapse of the species in question
Assumption 5: Females are not violent (lol)

May i invite you for dinner?

3031

Who, the fuck, said men are violent and females are not?

Who are you debating? The voices in your head?

3032

Male wolves in packs suffer a testosterone drop to enable them to participate in the pack dominated by an alpha.

The feminine is more condusive to cooeprative strategiesw - see bees, ant…

More malleable…more easily indoctrinated.

Indoctrinate females and you can indoctrinate males…like you…and those defending feminism.

Beta-male strategies - virtue signalling as a compensation for lacking masculine fitness markers.

Lard brained females are genetic filters, serving as memetic filters…ideological filters…

3033

I simply extrapolated what you said.

The problem with your idea is that unlike human males which turned into reddit caricatures over the last couple of decades, wolves do not turn into Chihuahuas due to not being the alpha.

Similarly the idea that females are more cooperative is absolutely not the case when it comes to human beings. The highest divorce rates in existence are coming from female/female relationships, and you could write several books on what cooperation looks like for women.

But hey im apparently indoctrinated by females or smth
Not only that i am also suddenly a feminist of all things lol

3034

Women are cooperative because that satisfies their role…dependence is part of their role.

Marriage is a male invention, meant to integrate as many males and female into the system.

Females are genetic filters and they benefit from diversity - they must not place all their ova in one basket, so as to0 increase the survivability of their investments, in a fluctuating environment.

So, they benefit form marriage but noly for a certain period of time - the seven year itch - at which point they lose sexual interest in the male and they seek another.

This is why feminization is accompanied by the slogan “diversity is strength”.

Females are sperm samplers…buyers, shoppers by nature.

Men invented monogamy and marriage…this is why females resent paternalism.

It inhibits their sexual powers - limits their sexual options, and forces them to settle for inferior males..

3035

True but also completely redactive. Whether within the 7 year period or before, women too are highly territorial and competitive. The only reason the myth of female cooperation exists is because their choice of weaponry is rarely physical. Its almost exclusively psychological or societal.

I have very visceral reactions to nonsense statements like “diversity is strength”

It was a perfectly valid survival strategy that gave birth to the nuclear family. The alternative you are suggesting cannot even be conceptualized in modern society because it would involve every woman basically being a street hoe.

Not saying that their instincts are not pushing them toward that (respect to the exceptions) but that is really not a valid survival strategy.

Ah yes, like in today’s dating market where every woman wants the top 5% of men and end up aging to 40 before realizing how badly they f-ed up cause they gonna now spend the rest of their lives alone.

I’d say that system you are talking about gave them security and a future.
The limitations are pretty much off today and the consequences are for everyone to see.
The future is single moms and single cat ladies.

3036

For fuck sake. Single mothers have always been the norm. The ‘nuclear family’ is a stupid American myth. The reason women live so long past menopause is because THEY were the ones who took on the raising of their children’s children in the very frequent event that the mother died, ensuring that their ‘longevity gene’ got passed on. Anyone who does genealogy for even a short time can see how many women brought up their children alone. Men have a habit of taking off or getting themselves killed in wars etc. Safe, legal abortion wasn’t available and nor was welfare so what the fuck were women supposed to do?

3037

The only force females employ is psychological…that’s why Jews, being a feminine dogma, uses subversion and psychology to fight its enemies.

Females are attracted to power or anything that provides stable, predictable environments to carry out their reproductive role…why?

Because they are vulnerable during it…during gestation and during the fertilization process.

Ah..a female…

Nevertheless, you might be an outlier or a masculine female, or an exception to the rule.

As a rule, females are genetic filters - when indoctrinated they become memetic or ideological filters - that benefit from diversity and stable, predictable, environments.

They have sacrificed independence and physical strength, to cultivate dependence and psychological advantages.

It was a perfectly valid survival strategy that gave birth to the nuclear family. The alternative you are suggesting cannot even be conceptualized in modern society because it would involve every woman basically being a street hoe.

I have offered no alternative…I’ve only explained what is and why it is so.

There are monogamous species, but humans are not one of them. Pair boding is not natural to primates.

Marriage and monogamy is a paternalistically imposed and manmade ideals, that makes civilization possible.

Females are inclined towards superior males…which means if they had it their way 10% of men would have sex and 90% would never.

Socrates called marriage a technology.

Another factor…

Females can be physically attracted to males they find ideologically, socially, ethically repulsive, and be ideologically, ethically, socially attracted to men they find physically repulsive…why?

Because they carry genes naturally selected over tens of thousand of years in austere, natural environments, whilst being born and indoctrinated into a manmade and maintained social system that holds ideals that contradict their genetic impulses.

Mind/Body Cartesian dissonance…

This is the extent of feminine mystique and complexity.

1 Like