The feminization of men...

Imagine being a multi-millionaire best-selling author of multiple books, have a safe tenured academic high paying job, well-known over the whole world and have your own groupie following of diehard fans, preach stuff like “stand up straight” and “have a backbone”… then cries about people being mean to you on twitter.

LOL.

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

He’s so macho…swooooon!

_
This happened, to him…

[b]Considering what we now know about modern illnesses, such as extreme/chronic
fatigue… who do you think is right, in this instance? Joe Rogan or his guest…

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SboeW4eG0WE[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A4Nbo-iAgY[/youtube]

I listened to about 2/3 to 3/4 of the second video & while I agree with a lot of it, I stopped when he said feminists teach that disagreement is a jailable offense. lol Come on now.

Just to leave it on a bit more of an affirming note… I said the same stuff about how the “me too” movement has to have people afraid to make the first/any move. I don’t know what to do about that. It seems like people just keep getting married and having kids and stuff, so I’m pretty sure they worked it out. ‘Course it’ll prolly end in disaster. :wink:

Feminization of Man.

Emasculate man is more controllable.
Hypermasculinity = overcompensation for declining masculine energy.
When real masculinity is absent females fill in the void with a caricature of how they imagine a man to be…adopting a pop-cultural idol given to them by those who control media and Hollywood.

Feminization eliminates all competing cultural sources of identity - individuals are “liberated” so that they can adopt an identity from the market place - Americanism, i.e., culture-of-no-culture.
What’s left to an Americanised individual but pop-culture, to find himself/herself a caricature to wear as a mask, concealing an underlying void.
Money becomes the means of purchasing an identity…a character to perform. You earn money by proving your loyalty and utility to the system that backs it up.
As long as you play a role that does not threaten it, it allows you to play any role you desire.

I disagree with so much of that, ibut it goes so many different directions.

one time i was wasted in this hipster dive bar where the whole schtick with them was that the place was super gutter and trashy etc. the bartenders were like the kind of dudes who bleach their hair blonde then dye a strip of it pink and as far as i could tell were super gayish.

so i figured out that they had open wifi and that the big tv over the bar was connected to it and i got shit faced and started fucking with them by casting things to the tv and interrupting the show that the bartenders had on.

started off with youtube videos of kittens and puppies, then they switched it back. then i moved on to like people doing those slap knockouts like compilations of those and then they noticed and switched it back. the whole time no one knew it was me doing this.

then i moved on to videos of police brutality like the cops beating and shooting people. then they noticed and switched it back.

then i got progressively drunker and found a site which i could cast to the tv which had a video of a male to female trans surgery on it so the next thing you know the big tv above the bar was showing an up close video of a surgery where someone was getting their dick cut off. i started laughing so loud then they noticed that it was me and they got super pissed and the gayest looking one of them all started screaming at me “ITS YOU!!! YOURE THE ONE PUTTING DICKS ON THE TV!!” and it turned into this whole hilarious scene where i kept saying increasingly fucked up shit to him like “bro this is perfectly natural and you’re a bigot if you turn it off you are a trans phobe”. I could go on and on but that’s basically the whole story.

Thanks, yeah I know I am. It doesn’t come easy…

I can help with that.

Men avoid romance either because 1) they are fat (or zoomerish skinny bags of bones) boring and unsuccessful simps who not many females want to be involved with, or 2) they are based and intelligent and self-confident enough to realize that most females are a profound waste of their time and will have an overall negative impact on their lives if they get too involved.

You could say the same about alcohol^^

Why I’m divorced & decidedly not in a relationship unless convinced otherwise:

You mean we avoid relationships because alcohol is better? I would have a hard time disagreeing with that, at least in most cases.

because easier

easier def not better

Freud looking at you with raised eyebrow & smirk

I don’t drink, for the record.

I didn’t say easier, I said better.

Creepy. Good thing that pervert is dead.

Then what did you mean with your comment about alcohol? I must have misunderstood.

I am just calling for rightly ordered love. Alcohol & women used interchangeably are disordered loves, except at least using alcohol to fill the void isn’t exploiting a person (directly).

Don’t ask me how rightly ordered sexual love works. I said I’m divorced.

The Freud smirk was about relationships being harder — therefore, if avoiding them due to that, stop — a reverse psychology bugs bunny move that would make Freud smirk, since arrived at as if slipping.

No further questions.

Rightly ordered love would require both parties to be… rightly ordered already. Or at least rightly able to order themselves through each other’s interactions and with/in the relationship itself. In my experience and observation that is very rare. Most people are too selfish, too dumb, too lazy or too distracted to be capable of that.

Ah, ok then. Carry on.

Yes. You would need to be sober-minded 100% of the time, no?

When you’ve lost your past, your only access to a future is the female and her unforgiving filtering.
It keeps men-children humbly at her feet begging to be allowed into the eternal garden.