I was very brief . would like to elaborate.
I have a blog going in a different forum in psychology that explains it more on detail of the notion that perhaps may shed more light.
Just read a very enlightening book by Brown Weiss , at once brilliant and sedating.
It’s title is 'Many Lives, Many Masters.
At first it seemed like a work in irony, but afterwards it not only made sense, but had a very sobering effect.
The idea of reincarnation through hypnotic regression, reveals a patient suffering from various fears and obsessions, being able, to reveal an undercurrent of multiple lifetimes.
All of the life times show various upward manifestations of the evolving differ in human beings , all essentially appearing as differing bodies.
This idea matches and reflects the Buddhic idea of reincarnation , and the more recent trans-humanistic progression are similar, as well.
The idea being is that the western phenomenal philosophy is reflected in the vastly earlier nominal ideas in the Vedas.
The idea that each individual person possesses individuality, although merely based on an ontological semantic analysis, signals an up and coming closure with the current signs. They are never formally ‘identical’ but is based on more objective criteria formed out of the mirror effect.
In other words we as individuals can never see ourselves completely, because our image of our self is a composite of other’s impression .
Evolution plays a part , where Nature develops more receptive neurological systems producing lessening sodferentiability between the image and the concept of the self.
Higher evolution toward succeeding elevation of levels , ultimately lead to the approach toward increasing closeness the levels approaching the absolute.
This absolute is not ever an ideal set of unity , but contain several sets getfing closer to each other through identifiable members of variety of differing sets .
The Quasi simulated sets implement such evolution and become part of the evolving 'natural
schema. At some point, they also become undifferentiable, and set again in an upward pro-position.
This idea appears to augment the cosmological arguments for God, rather then detracting from them.