the fourth thesis.....

the other day, I listed 3 thesis, today, I discuss the next
steps…

what are the assumptions that underline the modern political landscape?

Take IQ45 followers and their loser leader, IQ45 and play out
their underlined beliefs…
this TFH party holds to certain principles, so let us spell out
these principles…

they are anti-science… anti-rationalism, anti-medicine…
so if we understand them correctly, they are against education…
to be educated is to be pro-science… look at the population
that supports and is against IQ45… the liberal area’s/states are
also states with a highly educated population… the “blue” states
are very educated… NY, Cal, New Jersey, ILL, Mass, for example,
some of the best colleges in the world sit in these “blue” states,
Stanford, MIT, NYU, Northwestern, Princton, Cal…

Look at the “red states” they are clearly less educated states,
and they don’t seem to have as many higher ranking colleges…
Try to tell me that MISS or North Dakota has better colleges then
CA or NY… or that the residents of said states are better educated…
residents of “red” states are less educated from the very beginning of
their educational process… From Kindergarten to college, they are
nowhere near as well educated as residents of the “blue” states
these “red” states love IQ45 and part of the reason is that they
aren’t as educated as the “blue” states…

so one very important factor in the “red” state vs “blue” state,
is the role of education or lack therein…this lack of education is,
in part, why the “red” states are anti-education, anti-intellectual,
anti-science…

much more then wealth, is the understanding that education
is much more the divide between the ‘‘red’’ states and the ‘‘blue’’
states…

the left supports the BLM movement… and from this the right
claims that the left supports “violence” and yet, if we understand
this correctly, we see the actual events…

between 2014 and 2020, the police killed at least, 7680 people,
including Daunte wright, Andre Hill, Manuel Ellis, Gorge Floyd,
Breonna Tylor, Atatiana Jefferson…among others…
for these people their only crime was being black…
so, when we see millions of Americans protesting including BLM,
that means we are protesting racial inequality, violence against
blacks/minorities just because they are black/minorities…
what other course of action or remedies does the right offer
to the under siege black community against police violence?

they offer nothing because the right is in favor of violence
against the black/minority community…the saying “defund the police”
is an attempt to protect the black/minority community from the ever
present violence of the police against them…
and we see that the “red” states have empowered the police to
greater violence against the black/minority communities…
but recall one of my earlier thesis… that the right wing/conservative
fixed ideas is safety/security… and this play right into that thesis…

whereas the left holds to justice before safety/security… and we see this
in play in this case of the safety/security of the police actions vs,
the continued violence of the police against the black/minorities community…

when policeman kills a black/minority person, the right see’s their safety/security
being protected, and the left see’s someone justice/equality being violated…

and who is right?

we know, for a fact, that the right wing/conservative lives in fear…
they are afraid of everything… and listening to them, one would
think the entire world was on fire, (hence the lies about how much damage
was done by the BLM movement) but let us use the right wing safety/security
defense for the BLM movement…If I fear for my own safety/security from
the police, what are my options? I exist in fear for my safety/security as
well as I fear for my family safety/security from police brutality/violence…
then actions taken to protect my own and family safety/security can
and must include protesting the police… which is the heart of the BLM
movement…so using the conservative/right wing defense of
safety/security first, then we have ample justification for
the entire BLM movement…if the right wing/conservative claim
that guns are a means of protection, then the left/BLM movement
can also claim that mass protests are a means of protection from
police violence…so in our attempt to protect ourselves,
we have acted in violence, which the right wing/conservative
has no problem with (see Rittenhouse for that defense of violence)

the use of violence can be made using the safety/security defense,
on both sides…there is no difference from the “Rittenhouse” defense
to the defense of the BLM…

but as I have stated, time and time again, from certain beliefs/actions
there is no possibility of advancement… or to say it another way,
we can only get hate from hate, anger from anger, violence from violence…
hate, anger, violence are negative beliefs/actions and we cannot go from
an negative action/belief to a positive action/belief… negative beliefs/actions
can only bring about negative actions/beliefs… we can only move forward from
positive beliefs/actions… love brings about love and that is a positive action,
and hope can bring about hope and peace can bring about peace…we cannot
bring about a positive action/belief from a negative one… so we cannot
have peace come from a negative action/belief…so violence cannot bring
about peace, and hate cannot bring about love and anger cannot bring about hope…

and so, in this regard, the bible, the New Testament is about
the “new” biblical action/belief which is different than the “Old
Testament” in which the focus wasn’t on love but on having faith/belief
in god… read the “Old Testament” and the believers were rewarded
and those who committed “insubordination” were punished…you cannot
read the “Old Testament” in any other way… why was Adam/eve punished?
Why was Job tortured? The story of Sodom and Gomorrah…
the story of Abraham and the binding of Isaac?

the “Old Testament” had no use for love… god had no use for love in
the “Old Testament”…it was god’s way or the highway in the "Old Testament’'…
but if we understand this correctly, we receive what we offer up…
so if god can only offer up the “my way or the highway”, then
we can say, ok, the highway… there is only two answers in the
“My way or the highway”… god’s way or the highway…

but offer up love, as the “New Testament” does, then
we can accept love as the answer, a positive question will
get a positive answer…love will bring back love…
hate can only bring back hate…anger can only bring back anger…
and violence can only bring back violence…

so when we see this in action, we see that the “story”
of early America was a positive one… come to the “city on the hill”,
that was a positive message… and that was met with positive reaction…
but today, we have a negative message, a negative story to offer up the
world and thus we receive only a negative response…we are no longer
that “shinning city on the hill” and why? Because we can only see
the hate, violence, anger, lust, despair… the basic message of
the right wing/conservative…

have I ever advocated violence on this website? no, because violence
isn’t the answer to the questions of existence…

there is a third way, not of the right wing violence and hatred and anger,
and not of the left wing… but a third message, a message that must be
positive that will announce a new way into the future…

and that is my fourth thesis… we need a new way into the future…

Kropotkin

They are, properly speaking, against corruption (in science, in medicine, in academia, in education, etc.)

It’s a very sophisticated machinery that trains people how to be slaves. I can tell that you’re quite impressed by how sophisticated it is. It’s like saying “Look how cool my slavemaster is.” Is that really something to brag about? You gave up on your freedom in order to have a comfortable life that will end as soon as you become redundant.

K: how refreshing to admit you are “uneducated” you didn’t go to grade school, you didn’t go to high school
and you didn’t go to college… I admire your candor…

Kropotkin

It was mostly a waste of time. But that’s not to say that there is no place for schools. You don’t seem to be able to differentiate between “education in general” and “modern day education”. I don’t know how to help you with that. The point is that modern day education isn’t designed to make your kids smart. I mean, it does make them smart – in some ways, and to certain extent – but it also turns them into slaves. Of course, they can’t be overt about it, so there must be some semblance, a convincing illusion, that they are teaching kids to think on their own.