The Future Is So Bright It Burns My Eyes.

The future is so bright it burns my eyes or how I came to love nuclear bombs.

Imagine the species of enlightenment, rationality, reason, peace, morality, ethics, cooperation, virtue, brotherly love, order, and God bombing the entire planet with nuclear weapons destroying itself along with all life on the planet. What a great human triumph it would be!

A triumph in comedic gold that is as it would be the greatest joke of all time! I personally can’t think of anything more funnier. It would be the most epic form of hilarity. Of course destroying all life on the planet there would be nobody left to get the intended pun line. Maybe with a mushroon cloud in the sky burning the eye sockets of a random individuals as they bleed profusely from them we could have a nice chuckle a couple of seconds before being completely eradicated into dust or ash. By doing so we can all try to get in our last big fuck you to the entire world.

If this is what all of humanity, the world, and universe amounts to it’s better to burn down the whole stinking rotten edifice. In the dead silence of global nuclear winter finally after many thousands of years there is lasting peace on earth…

It is questionable whether this would bring lasting peace, as death has an infinite amount of time to regenerate new and possibly more idiotic worlds hosting new and absurd forms of consciousness.

Looking at the world today sometimes I think it might just be better off left to the cockroaches…

That bad?

Aweeeeee… would you prefer a socialist Utopia? Is this what your hinting at?

Easy way to get rid of nukes… all the countries in the world target some desolate, backwoods location, and send all the nukes screaming into that one spot.

I hear Wyoming is pretty empty. Just carpet bomb its rural areas with nukes. We can want people 25 of Feb to leave by March 1, all the nukes are coming. Then… Boom!

Can there be no peace within chaos?

Arcturus, peace can only be achieved in the absence of life since wherever there is life conflict, struggle, and competition exists.

Peace is anti life.

I’m feeling a lot of anger in this thread.

Peace is anti-life? But that’s only from your experience.
I don’t mean the opposite of war here.

Good guess. :stuck_out_tongue: :smiley:

Feel free to debate the point then.

I was feeling a lot of anger this morning when on the news I heard that the pope say that women MAY use contraception. You have no idea how that angered me - the stupidity of it, the arrogance of it.
Also, the other day I was feeling much anger when I came to learn how the president has decided that it is a good thing to cut by half what is needed to fight terrorism.
Two very stupid thoughts!!!

In the future everybody is wearing SunTan 9000 for extra radiation protection.

Can’t have a proper whoring around town without the pill. Oops…Did I say that out loud?

No. 3. lol

You don’t understand, nuclear weapons will be used to usher in a global socialist utopia.

They have to burn down the global village in order to save it…

What do you got against Wyoming?

Gees, again, you just changed your avatar.
You know, I don’t think that we human beings can live happily in peace. We need struggle, strife, mayhem to exist.
It’s part of our human evolution. Just like there is day and night, hot and cold, there must always be war and peace, et cetera.
One other thing, this may be the first time I’ve ever posted in this Foum. Not sure, but it well might be.

Peace is nonexistent. Peace is an illusion. Always at any moment of time a war of some kind is taking place.

I’m talking about the patriarchal idiocy of the man. I’m pretty much celibate for a time now. It matters nothing to me what he says about anything, the pope that is.

arc, any decision at this point in history will have its own set of problems. if the pope didn’t say that and funding to fight terrorism wasn’t cut, there would still be some other set of consequences for those decisions and so forth. damned if you do, damned if you don’t. diogenes knew this… which might be one of the reasons he chose not to attend the politics debates in the public square. the usual crowd was always there though… platonists and the sophists going back and forth about the nature of the good. diogenes wasn’t tryin’ to hear all that.