I’m with you, and I have noted that porn viewers are usually one of two versions: either they use imagery that is posing, or imagery that is simulating actual sex. With a lesbian scene, the viewer has to “put himself there” and that requires concentration. With an actual sex scene, the viewers replace themselves with one of the two or more actors and/or actresses, and although there is this same projection, there is less effort in concentrating and the details are not left for the imagination to discover.
For example, if I watch a scene where a chick’s ass is the main spectacle, I might imagine her in a doggy-style position. So it is with intercourse scenes; one doesn’t have to imagine as much, the details are there.
One of my early girlfriends used to, upon request, move in a semi-pooched out succulent way, pouting a little here or there, and finally posing, before sex. I loved to watch her undress in the aforementioned poochedoutedness. To this day my brain has several files stored where I can recall many images as if I were there.
When I finish my hologram machine, along with my thermodynamic digital ionizer, I’m going to recreate the atomic structures of those events and experience them again.
(if any of you were clever you would say “time to move on, detrop.”)
Now that I’ve said it, you can’t say it. So suffice it to say that Melody was unlike any girlfriend and I going to invent a way to have interactive porn sessions with holographic virtual imagery of memorable women.
For a small fee you can come into my clinic and we’ll download some memories and arrange a scene where you can experience it. Electrodes will be placed on your head to stimulate sensory perception, while you interact with a holographic image. When, for example, you are touched, a stimulus will be prompted to produce that sensation. In other words, the reality will have density, mass, shape, and movement, while it is only a hologram.
I can make a brain in a jar work, people.