Coca-Cola
(Coca-Cola)
December 8, 2007, 10:49pm
1
I was reading and came across this idea. I just thought I’d share.
NO time and changeless = One
It takes time to be Many .
It takes change to be Many .
Therefore:
There must be time to be Many
There is NO time at death
Therefore, death is One.
(the same proof goes for change.)
Coca-Cola
(Coca-Cola)
December 8, 2007, 10:56pm
2
axiom - there is either One or Many - unless there is nothing… nothing does not exist in the universe, therefore there is always something.
Coca-Cola
(Coca-Cola)
December 8, 2007, 11:03pm
3
There is always One in NO time and changeless because there is no time or change to make Many.
There is no potentiality in changeless and NO time to be more than One.
Can’t make is clearer than that.
Coca-Cola
(Coca-Cola)
December 8, 2007, 11:15pm
4
I found an error with calling it ‘timeless’ but ‘no time’ works a lot easier because timelessness is usually seen as eternity and saying there’s no potentiality for Many in eternity is incorrect. So, forgive me, I changed it to NO time. I changed all of them so if you read it before, reread it makes more sense.
Coca-Cola
(Coca-Cola)
December 8, 2007, 11:28pm
5
No time = one
Changeless = one
NO time cannot have many
The changeless cannot have many
Time = many
Change = many
Many already exists
inhahe
(inhahe)
December 10, 2007, 1:53am
7
Coca-Cola:
I was reading and came across this idea. I just thought I’d share.
NO time and changeless = One
It takes time to be Many .
It takes change to be Many .
Therefore:
There must be time to be Many
There is NO time at death
Therefore, death is One.
(the same proof goes for change.)
there could be time at death.