Descartes didn’t understand REALITY philosophy;science or psychology Ichthus.
Take it elsewhere—back to your own thread.
Final thought: It’s the little things that are the big things, and don’t sweat the small stuff.
I was reviewing my systematic theologies on the Trinity to see if they had stuff about Unity in Distinction (sidenote: there’s a passing reference to “unity and diversity” in Wayne Gruden‘s Bible Doctrine, and this sentence in another one: “The unified equality and yet distinctness is seen in the triadic references to the three persons.”). I have Strong’s, and wanted to see if he’s the same Strong as Strong’s numbers (he isn’t). I acquired this from my dad. I decided to google this dude, and we are very closely aligned, except he uses the word monism. He didn’t connect the dots to triunity, despite affirming the Trinity. It’s one of those things where people need to realize simple can mean unity. This is an enormous problem in philosophy and related fields. I keep saying this.
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/review/augustus-hopkins-strong-and-the-struggle-to-reconcile-christian-theology-with-modern-thought/
Now to check the other one (the stuff I keep seeing across different philosophers is definitely in Strong… not done exploring that one… we’ll come back to it).