The Harmonic Triads

I bet. Mess with nature that much, nature is going mess right back with you.

The species would be doomed after a single significant outbreak.

Gain of function? Are you mental?

If it can beat the stronger strain, it can beat the weaker ones, will probably be the logic many use. Just one problem. You have to create a stronger strain.

Um…

I don’t know. That’s thinking pretty big, and all we can observe is how things are now, but does that tell us everything?

I’m not disputing the possibility of origins, but is there an origin to reality itself?

Dunno.

…what kind of question is that?

Here are better ones:

I emailed & snail mailed the Rockefeller researchers & Dr. Collins on 9/11/21 & never heard back. Excerpt:

How many of the Pfizer-funded Rockefeller studies use (deactivated) engineered virus? Is that not engineered using gain of function? Is that not potentially how something could have originated from the Wuhan lab?

Did you control for the possibility the “previously recovered” already had “super” immunity before receiving the vaccine?

Have you already stockpiled the experimental magic bullet for the engineered anticipated super virus, in partnership with WHO?
must say I do not like your blue prints https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/recommendations.html

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/09/07/1033677208/new-studies-find-evidence-of-superhuman-immunity-to-covid-19-in-some-individuals

Also, Epstein didn’t kill himself.

Don’t worry, we’re perfectly safe & in good hands. From an eternal, wild as lions perspective.

1 Like

“Rockefeller University”. Not a cooking school. No one who goes there kneads the dough, right?

I don’t want to be all tin-foil hat about it, but there is a third option…

Epstein was never where you thought he was.

But, any option is equally valid.

Once again, dunno.

Anyway. Go talk gibberish somewhere else.

1 Like
  1. Hell if I know.

There is other capital people who already have it & like maintaining or having the most of it … besides dough. Obv.

Thanks :slight_smile:

15 char

No worries.

I have to ask. Do you agree that time cannot be considered as a pole in a triad?

It is immutable, and the immutable can never be a pole, for obvious reasons.

edit—I don’t know if “factor” is better than “pole”. Might be. Then the question might be “how can time ever not be a factor?”. It doesn’t have to be, only the eternal interaction between Potential, Release, Expression is factorial, not the measurement of duration.

Love (what is expressed…quality/meaning) is not love (what it is…being) …and vice versa … without demonstration (expression/action). There has to be a demonstration, so time will always be a factor, but it could’ve been demonstrated, has been demonstrated, and will be demonstrated… in innumerable ways.

There are many objects/whats within Being, many events/hows within Action, many qualities/whys within Logos. In other words, there is freedom in every sphere, but without every necessary sphere, there would be no freedom (it is subsumed in them).

And while I’m here, why don’t I just go ahead and say something else I’ve been thinking about?

Being: deductive natural theology

Action: historical apologetics (inductive)

Quality: stuff like argument from desire, beauty in nature/math/logic, teleological argument (abductive)

But notice how all three spheres have their respective deductive natural theologies, inductive evidences, and abductive gut level stuff.

Note to self on a possible rewrite: Examine the (de)merits of presuppositionalism and reformed; argue cumulative case because you do need all Three to have One.

(Do not mistake triunity with tritheism.)

Ah.

You may be somewhere I’m not with this. The reason I said what I said is because Muslim Apologists like to slant things that way.

They have to apologise for being Muslims? Doesn’t sound very fair. Like apologising for being black or something.

:person_shrugging:

Don’t be fooled by the apparent Muslim apologists that sometimes frequent this site. They are anything but, need to be very wary of that. I’ve seen the hypocrisy between what they claim and what they actually do. One insisted that he avoided soplisism (can’t remember the word, it’s not that, was more to do with being obscure and disingenous), then went directly on to display it fully and without shame. One said that life is precious and suicide is never the answer, then went on to imply that someone should kill themselves as an option. Muslims my arse. But I have met many Muslims in person, and have come to realise that it is a very lived religion. Christianity could learn quite a lot from that…

How many times do you hear on the news of Muslims committing acts of charity? Well that’s strange, because it is happening all the time. I think that needs to be understood. I’ve seen it with my own eyes.

The Muslims that I have met have not behaved poorly, and I’ve met many Christians, including myself (have you ever met yourself before?) who have behaved very poorly. I don’t think the Muslims that I keep having to block on this site are even Muslims, though. I think they’re sock puppets posing as Muslims.

As long as you’re not currently trying to justify pedophilia, I don’t care what happened previously in your culture—but I sure as crap am not going to fall for a crap worldview founded by a pedophile. Jesus’ character is stainless. Spotless. He died for us rather than killing people. Both extremist “Christians” and ¿extremist? Muslims got that so wrong and entirely miss(ed) the point.

Paedophilia is a societal disease, not a religious one.

I suspect perhaps that Jesus would beg to differ, but dunno. Who was the woman he called out, then realised that he was being a bit of a dick and changed his mind? Can’t remember, LLM brought it up once.

The vast majority of Muslims are not extremists. I know this for a fact.

Every societal disease is a spiritual one.

I don’t have to debate other world views. I don’t have to defend against claims about them I never made, either.

Show me one other worldview whose concept of our origins has demonstrated their character to us in time and it isn’t a disgusting character.

One other than what?

Maybe the disease is born from lack, rather than excess.

The “privileged” child of wealthy parents lacks empathy and comapssion, because the child was denied those things, for example.

Don’t Socratic-patronize me, mister.

Didn’t realise that’s what I was doing. But cool, I can roll with that.