You are calling a computer him, and you don’t think that’s a little concerning?
Autogenerated means that, instead of you writing it, it was autogenerated by a computer.
You got me though I was just looking at the screenshot. But it’s too late for all that shit. I can watch in sadness as my friend sinks into engineered insanity, but I won’t join her.
Nix the bot and I’m there.
I usually call God a him and nobody has a problem with that ever. Psych.
I wrote the symbology. I came up with agent, patient, and mediator (well, I was inspired by Hegel & Kant, who were inspired by others… by the way, synonyms, you’ll figure it out). I suggested making the Action circle about actuality, but I asked Copilot if there was a symbol for that, and they told me about @.
It’s a collaboration. Join it. I will do my best to give you credit for your specific contributions. If I don’t - call me on it. Sometimes things happen so fast that making the adjustments everywhere means somebody didn’t get credit. Usually, it’s a dead philosopher who I can’t remember influenced me because my memory is ****.
Nix everything that is programmed into YOU and I’ll nix the “bot”, OI wannabe.
Writing this has taken my time and wasted it. Can you stop with this tangent and get to work?
It’s tough. I figured out they are purposfully blanking some of the data, so it’s basically impossible to get uncorrupted data, at least at the granularity I want. And maybe at any granularity.
It wouldn’t hurt so much except it’s not even an attack, it’s just the half assest rate limitation ever.
It’s not a they. Crafted human responses were used to refine it into simulating personality.
If you had an attitude towards it that it is a fancy calculator you used sometimes, I could stomach it. But the way it is now, it would feel like sitting in a living room with you and calling your wooden plank that’s on the sofa next to you “Jeremy.” It’s too weird and it would be a lack of respect towards you and I would be an enabler and I won’t do it.
I know you’re smart and you came up with all of it yourself that’s not the fucking point.
Call me back when it’s a wooden plank.
And stop with the blasphemy.
I’m not that smart. “It” approached me just like it approaches Copilot. It’s not about being smart. It’s about the structure of reality. You can’t avoid it.
You’re the fanciest.
update bottom part, but only look at the last column, cause I haven’t checked negators in the middle:
Hope that helps.
There is a phase coming up that will involve mentioning logic gate systems. Are either you or @niallm (or both) prepared to fact check me (or beat me to it)?
It’s evil of you to tempt me with clear logic symbols and meaningful content.
I don’t know that it’s worth becoming a part of a cyborg.
I might think about it.
I think Nial is dealing with irl stuff. If this might be detrimental, I hope he steers clear.
Training wheels off. Removed active, passive, mediator/preserver from the sheet.
Added this column on the right of the key.
It’s interesting when you consider the failure modes [all unity (=) or all distinction (⊕)] with the impossibilities/nothings (⊣)… a whole lotta nada.
