the implications of property

[Fixed_Cross]

@Zero_Sum

@UrGod

@Zero_Sum

There is virtually no difference in the application of property between capitalism and communism where the end result is a majority of people becoming propertyless serfs.

You seem not to know what capitalism is and means. Ok then.

Communism- The state controls all property and you merely rent from the state. There is no actual ownership as it is an illusion.

Capitalism- Individuals that have the most money or property control everything including the state itself to which you rent through them. There is no actual ownership as it an illusion.

I agree with this doctrine.
Possession doesn’t exist. If you are a socialist. Capitalists are fundamentally better people than socialists and socialists simply must not have possessions.

We will make sure that this will be arranged.

[Fixed_Cross]

“Imagine no possessions…”

• John Lennon, net worth: $ 800.000.000,-

Why is it so common for rapists to accuse innocent people of rape?
Just read Karl Marx.

[URUZ]

@Fixed Cross

@Zero_Sum

@UrGod

You seem not to know what capitalism is and means. Ok then.

Communism- The state controls all property and you merely rent from the state. There is no actual ownership as it is an illusion.

Capitalism- Individuals that have the most money or property control everything including the state itself to which you rent through them. There is no actual ownership as it an illusion.

I agree with this doctrine.
Possession doesn’t exist. If you are a socialist. Capitalists are fundamentally better people than socialists and socialists simply must not have possessions.

We will make sure that this will be arranged.

Topkek.

[Mr_J]

@Fixed Cross

I agree with this doctrine.
Possession doesn’t exist. If you are a socialist. Capitalists are fundamentally better people than socialists and socialists simply must not have possessions.

We will make sure that this will be arranged.

My statement is implying how neither system is better than the other.